It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO photos

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 06:16 PM
link   
Ugh, Im new here so I have no Idea how to post photos on here... so heres a link to the part of my site with them.

www.geocities.com...

Well here goes... When I was in Toronto Canada I noticed these two things in the sky. Im not really sure if they are ufo's or what, but thay sure do look like it.
But hey, I guess its good I carry a camera with me everywhere wit' me.



posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 06:21 PM
link   
Looks like clouds to me, but it's hard to tell.

Welcome to ATS though.



posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 06:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ixxy
Well here goes... When I was in Toronto Canada I noticed these two things in the sky. Im not really sure if they are ufo's or what, but thay sure do look like it.
But hey, I guess its good I carry a camera with me everywhere wit' me.

Thanks for sharing, Ixxy
. Is there anything else you can share about this? Size? Movement? Speed? More witnesses?



posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 06:36 PM
link   
yea they are kind a like clouds, they looked pretty real when I photographed them, but since I have the cheapest camera and scanner I kinda butcherd it x.x

As fo movment, Im not so sure, it was had to keep my eyes on them.
Witnesses would be the ppl wit' me and a few others I dont know.



posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 06:40 PM
link   
But were they stationary or did they move at all? Anything else you remember?



posted on Oct, 12 2004 @ 11:26 AM
link   


the thing i hate about ufo pictures is that they are always blured

why? why cant a person get a normal shot of these things

when i say this i dont mean that they are fake but just that i am fusturated at the quality of the pics!

anyway...



posted on Oct, 12 2004 @ 11:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by firestarter666
why? why cant a person get a normal shot of these things

Because persons have normal cameras with average experience, usually meaning pretty bad quality unless one take time. Range (since a UFO is *usually* flying) and resolution means it turns out crap unless its just a perfect opportunity.



posted on Oct, 12 2004 @ 11:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by firestarter666


i am fusturated at the quality of the pics!


I know damn well if I had a camera and I saw a UFO, 1...I would be in a panic trying to get the camera ready before the UFO disappeared and 2... I would be shaking like a leaf with the adrenalin rush of excitement. So my photo's would be pretty bad.




top topics



 
0

log in

join