It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PvtHudson
Originally posted by citizenx1
Originally posted by PvtHudson
Originally posted by citizenx1
Basically, its not ok to just come to the country and slag us off. Its ok for us to do it but not Romney.
Please quote when Romney "slagged off" your country. I'll wait patiently.
Wait all you like, thats the clear perception of the British public.
You might find this and the links in the report interesting.
www.bbc.co.uk...
Like I said earlier. You guys are not only easily manipulated by your media, you revel in it. You're almost proud of it.
Originally posted by PvtHudson
You Brits used to rage about Gitmo..Whatever happened to that? it seemed to stop as soon as Obama took office. In fact, there is a laundry list of things Brits cared about under Bush, that they stopped caring about the second their media stopped harping on it.
Originally posted by timetothink
Any citizen of any country involved in the Olympics has that right.
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by timetothink
Any citizen of any country involved in the Olympics has that right.
And we have the right to take offence, no?
Again, all bit ironic because if anyone dares criticise the US, you're all up in arms about it as well. Nobody likes someone else from the outside criticising them.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
reply to post by PvtHudson
I am a fan of neither, and I am extremely suspicious of exactly why our PM is even holding court with Romney - this is not protocol.
Cameron declined a meeting with the French potential leader stating that it was policy not to endorse a person running for office in another nation in such a way. Yet, he's meeting very publicly with Romney?
However, regardless of my feelings towards both Romney and Obama (I really don't like either, I think Romney is a republican hypocrite and Obama is a puppet who has done more to disappoint American voters than any president before him) I cannot equate Obama giving the Queen an iPod with Romney making public statements about the Olympics.
On a political level it is clear to see who has been the most inappropriate and it has nothing to do with double standards. Obama has made some humorous gaffs, Romney potentially insulted the country. That is the difference here, from a political and media pandering point of view.
The papers are assuming that people give a damn (most of us actually don't), but they correctly see that insulting an entire nation is a political disaster compared to Obama or the First Lady doing something that most Brits would find smirk-inducing.
I don't read the tabloid trash, but I can tell you with some authority that the people are not impressed with any American politician, left or right. We simply do not give a damn about who you elect, what their opinions are and whether they are embarrassing or not.
Also, most of the people of the UK are fed up with the Olympics already, and we fully accept that G4S have been a disaster from the start.
This is not news to us, Romney probably had the majority of the UK public agreeing with him. The media thought we give a crap about it. We don't. But on the scale of errors, insulting a nation (if we cared about what he's attacking) would be far more embarrassing than giving her Maj an iPod.