It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by Goldcurrent
reply to post by article
Don't worry about th OP's position much. If you participate on the same threads long enough, you'll see he can often come off as a cold, bitter, old man. Hence the suitable avatar.
Right Jig?
Well, when you're right, you're right. But this clip really pulled at my heart strings. I'm not looking at the boy's problems, but at the sweet, innocent little darlings that should NEVER have to experience such insane brutality. One parent's right to have a little monster is more important than every other parent's right to keep their babies safe.
It's just not acceptable to allow society to stay on this path. Taking care of a disturbed child's issues AFTER his/her actions have harmed other children (mentally for life) is too dam late.
If that 9 year old had been a man, he probably could have been facing life in prison. We would have called him too sick to remain in society. Whether a man, or a 9 year old, the damage to the innocent children is exactly the same. It's wholly unacceptable and should not be tolerated.
I repeat, I don't know what the answer is, but not asking the hard questions is definitely the wrong path.
Originally posted by Hawking
You can say what you want about government over-regulation, but there should absolutely be a license to reproduce, as well as a license to vote in the general election
If you can't answer a few very basic questions correctly, or have an IQ lower than 90 you shouldn't be allowed to do either
Originally posted by darkbake
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
Originally posted by 1littlewolf
If you have an IQ that high yet don't realize that your chances of bearing children drop off significantly after the age of 35 there's something wrong with you.
Being omniscient of every single fact isn't a prerequisite of a high IQ. Maybe they didn't know.
I don't think having a high IQ has much to do with being good parents, look at James Holmes, for a timely example. I think if you are worried about dumb people, you should focus on improving the education system.
Originally posted by 1littlewolf
So what level of education do you believe is required before you can start breeding.
And if you have for whatever reason you haven't reached this level of education and you fall pregnant will you be forced to have an abortion or will you simply have your child taken away from you?
This thread is absolutely pathetic. I've known Down Syndrome parents who've raised the most well balanced loving children and university professors whose kids have turned out to be complete nightmares.
Originally posted by Hawking
You can say what you want about government over-regulation, but there should absolutely be a license to reproduce, as well as a license to vote in the general election
If you can't answer a few very basic questions correctly, or have an IQ lower than 90 you shouldn't be allowed to do either
Seriously, you believe the government should be responsible for deciding who should or should not be able to bear children. Have you looked at the decisions made by the government lately. God save us.edit on 26/7/2012 by 1littlewolf because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by darkbake
On a side note, I do actually have a bad habit of talking in the 2nd person. Suggestions?edit on 27-7-2012 by darkbake because: (no reason given)
Depending on the context, I would suggest writing in the first-person. I used to do the same, until I realized I had know clue about how “you” do things, and could only ever speak for myself. When writing in the 2nd person, I risk people mistakenly thinking I'm actually referring to them.
I'm actually not thinking emotionally, although I am a bit sleep deprived. I honestly thought you were implying that smart people should breed and stupid people shouldn't. The video you posted was hilarious, by the way. But now I'm a little confused... are you just saying that only good parents should be allowed to have children? And you would hypothetically set up a system where "good parenting skills" would be analyzed and permits would be handed out?
This sounds like it could be hijacked by government supporters of whatever the dominant philosophy or dogma is at the time in order to give them a way to stifle reproduction of their opponents, after all, I think a lot of people equate "good parenting" with "follows my values system."
I am as yet undecided on the matter. I hate the thought of a governing body telling people who can and cannot have children. People can change, and the children they rase could be valuable to society as a whole. But if “stupidity” persists in the parents, and is indeed passed down in the indoctrination of their children as if it was an important part of their culture, I would second guess the parents abilities as a parent. Of course there's too many variables to arrive at anything conclusive.
We find, in the end, that it isn't entirely the parents fault, but has much to do with the culture of the society the parent and child lives in. If “stupidity” was discouraged, rather than showcased as a fundamental mindset of most western cultures in television and celebrity culture, we might finally see a rise in healthy parenting practices and the inspiration the children need to fill their curiosity with meaningful and valuable knowledge and life skills instead of the trash television is selling.
To me, stupidity isn't a low IQ, but a willful ignorance. The potential is in everyone to achieve mental and physical self-mastery no matter what their mental and physical limitations are. But the choice to not attempt a higher degree of self-mastery, merely because it involves a little work, is in my mind, stupid.
–LesMis extra DIV
Originally posted by Djayed
Originally posted by Hawking
You can say what you want about government over-regulation, but there should absolutely be a license to reproduce, as well as a license to vote in the general election
If you can't answer a few very basic questions correctly, or have an IQ lower than 90 you shouldn't be allowed to do either
I would vote on that...I would vote soo hard!
Originally posted by igor_ats
The question posits someone can measure intelligence (IQ is not good for measuring intelligence) and decides who gets to have babies. Since that is not going to happen ever OP is just wanting an excuse to vent and rant about poor ppl.
The closest examples I can think of are China (government mandated 1-child policy based merely on numbers) and the female abortions in India (culturally mandated once they do scans on pregnant women).