This is something that should really be looked into, as well as the fact that James Holmes claims he has memory loss (a claim that I am inclined to
believe after analyzing the courtroom video). I know a lot of people are probably going to say, "No, he has no memory loss" or "He is faking it" but I
don't think so.
Once again, here is the courtroom video if anyone is interested in checking it out for themselves. I also like comparing it to Breivek (the Norway
shooter) so people can see how much difference there is between the two individuals in their appearance, both convicted of similar crimes.
Another thing that should be taken into account is a lack of motive. For someone to have planned this over the course of a few months, doing it for no
reason does not fit the profile. In fact, let's look at other similar perpetrators, who had motives complicated enough to match the amount of
sophistication in their attacks.
Anders Behring Breivik
Breivik's far-right[26] militant ideology is described in a compendium of texts, titled 2083: A European Declaration of Independence and
distributed electronically by Breivik on the day of the attacks.[26][27][28][29] In it he lays out his worldview, which includes support for
anti-feminism,[30][31] Islamophobia, and far right Zionism.
Ted Kaczynski
Kaczynski sent a letter to The New York Times on April 24, 1995 and promised "to desist from terrorism" if the Times or The Washington Post
published his manifesto, Industrial Society and Its Future (also called the "Unabomber Manifesto"), in which he argued that his bombings were extreme
but necessary to attract attention to the erosion of human freedom necessitated by modern technologies requiring large-scale
organization.
edit on 26-7-2012 by darkbake because: (no reason given)
edit on 26-7-2012 by darkbake because: (no reason
given)
In my opinion, it is possible that those hypothetically working with Holmes
A) Did not expect him to survive
B) Did not expect his apartment to remain intact
C) Did not expect people like those on ATS to be conducting their own research.
In order to cover their tracks, they would need to:
A) Kill James Holmes
B) Infiltrate and corrupt the investigation
C) Devise a way to keep the alternative media from having an impact
They may or may not have the resources to do all of these things, they may have gotten in over their heads, and hopefully this is the case.
In the end, I would like someone to make a case for me that James Holmes was working on his own and did this on his own, it would have to include
reasoning for his attacks, a psychological exam to determine what was causing his memory loss, and how he got his explosive expertise, and what
happened to the room mates originally reported by the media.
edit on 26-7-2012 by darkbake because: (no reason given)
After all information is so
easily made and controlled how do you really know that the things your read about really happened if you were not there personally or at least have
some physical prof that it happened. The dangers of online or mass media mediums, they can be erased and controlled and even changed both suddenly or
subtly to fit any sort of thing that you can imagine. 
