Gay Marriage. I am honestly confused

reply to post by PurpleChiten


I can take care of that problem for ya. I know the right people! A little plastic surgery there and a bit of purple tattooing there... and, well, presto chango A BOLD AND BRAND SPANKING NEW YOU!

Originally posted by Annee

Originally posted by EvilSadamClone
reply to post by Annee

 

To help average and unattractive guys have a chance at finding love. If bigamy was legal, people like Arnold Schwarzenegger would snap them all up and other guys wouldn't have a chance to find one of his own.

IMO.

There is Bigamy - Polygamy - Polyandry - Polygyny - Trigamy - Polyamory.

Polyamory is group marriage which is on the rise.

Other then your own insecurity - - - I see no real logical reason against multiple marriage.

As long as I can have as many spouses as I want but none of them can have any others or be with anyone else, I'd be good with it!

Originally posted by EvilSadamClone
reply to post by PurpleChiten

 

I can take care of that problem for ya. I know the right people! A little plastic surgery there and a bit of purple tattooing there... and, well, presto chango A BOLD AND BRAND SPANKING NEW YOU!

noooooooooooooooooooooo can't mess with perfection dude!

reply to post by XaniMatriX




Where ever you went to school, there should be a full audit because they definitely are not teaching from any books that I am aware of.

One of the best threads ever. Laughing my ass off over here.

Originally posted by PurpleChiten
I hear ya! twists and turns and intertwining going on all over the place in this neck of the woods!!!!

Yes but at least some of us are out of the woods as far as genetics goes!

See? You taught me something!

Originally posted by MidnightTide
reply to post by Annee

 

How wrong you are, I am more then willing to accept that others will have a difference in opinion. I actually encourage it, but most "liberals" seem to think they know better then the rest of us - that their opinion somehow trumps everyone else.

Wrong about what? I was a 40+ year Republican.

Right Wing Conservatives are the LOUD MOUTH CARNIVAL BARKERS of the entire political world.

You are unwilling to tolerate anyone who disagrees with homosexuality.

You want to replace homosexuality with blacks. Perhaps you support the Curse of Ham - - that people with dark skin are cursed by god and shall be slaves.

Its from the bible - ya know.

(Genesis ch.9 v.20-27)

“And Noah began to be a husbandman, and he planted a vineyard.
And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent.
And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father and told his two brethren outside.
And Shem and Japheth took a garment and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were turned away, and they saw not their father's nakedness.
And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him.
And he said, "Cursed be Canaan! A servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren."
And he said, "Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.”

reply to post by PurpleChiten




He don't know me too well, do he?

Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by MidnightTide
reply to post by Annee

 

You want to replace homosexuality with blacks. Perhaps you support the Curse of Ham - - that people with dark skin are cursed by god and shall be slaves.

Its from the bible - ya know.

(Genesis ch.9 v.20-27)

“And Noah began to be a husbandman, and he planted a vineyard.
And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent.
And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father and told his two brethren outside.
And Shem and Japheth took a garment and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were turned away, and they saw not their father's nakedness.
And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him.
And he said, "Cursed be Canaan! A servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren."
And he said, "Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.”

Hello, Annee

Would you be so kind as to point out to me where, in the above passage, it states that Ham was cursed with dark skin?

reply to post by OpinionatedB


Oh my, OB, what a lively thread you have started

My congratulations on 50+ pages of a (relatively) polite and open exchange of...ideals.

J

reply to post by Annee

Right Wing Conservatives are the LOUD MOUTH CARNIVAL BARKERS of the entire political world.

Just because you say something doesn't mean it is fact, or the truth.

You want to replace homosexuality with blacks. Perhaps you support the Curse of Ham - - that people with dark skin are cursed by god and shall be slaves.

What are you going on about? I am not Christian, and I support gay marriage. I just can't stand those who think they should be able to tell people "You can't dislike homosexuals" Who gives you, or them that right? People should be free to like or dislike whatever they want.

reply to post by LadyJae


Thank you so much Lady. And I am thrilled you have granted us the pleasure of your company a while!

Always a pleasure.

Originally posted by Spiramirabilis

I feel very strongly about what I believe too - and trust me - I can be just as unmovable an object as there ever was when it comes to things I feel very strongly about

I'm old enough to have experienced the Civil Rights Movement. Forced integration - - forced busing - etc.

Not to mention the enactment of the: Fair Housing Act - - Disability Act - - and a few more Equality Issues.

When I was a kid - - if you wanted to know what a teacher wrote about you in your file - - you had to get a court order.

There is NO BELIEF involved here.

reply to post by nenothtu

Everyone is leftier than me - I'm just to the right of Atilla the Hun

:-)

Working within the system we have now is what will bring the system of tomorrow, What that will be depends entirely on what we do now, which Is why I argue in favor of gay marriage under the same legal umbrella as the rest of us.

Pretty much how I see it too - but I like this part the most

There are all sorts of "different" in this world, but only one law at any given point to apply to all of those differences.

I'm going to get out of here now - before I start singing Kumbaya

You would wear shiny armor - the reflections from it blind me!

noted - tactical error on your part - but, thanks

:-)

reply to post by nenothtu


I am saying it one last time, the LAW which we follow today, not common law, but the statutes you all hold so dear, was made using the bible, and they put their hands on the book when they signed the papers, in the name of the lord so to say, how many times do i have to say that? Which has everything to do with the thread, because we are talking about law and religion being against gay marriage. which in turn goes against common law and religion, im not repeating this one more time i hope u guys can understand that.

and a university proffesor, who teaches people what other people came up with, which are theories, CMON, whats the points of having an account on ats if ur gonna reffer to text books written and not changed for years now!!

If scientist can manipulate ATMOS, which they did using frequencies, then i am pretty sure you can manipulate DNA which they did. meaning that frequencies manipulate DNA structure, and only frequencies manipulate everything else in this universe. like i said, unfluences from the parents, schools, churches ect ect... so when the baby is born it has already been manipulated for 9 months, u want me to go into detail it will need a whole seperate thread for that.

www.abovetopsecret.com... THERE!! u like that, its a russian artcile the one i read, but it clearly shows how DNA is changed and manipulated, SOUND BABY!!

reply to post by LadyJae


You might want to read this wiki about it:

en.wikipedia.org...

Originally posted by OpinionatedB
reply to post by LadyJae

 

Thank you so much Lady. And I am thrilled you have granted us the pleasure of your company a while!

Always a pleasure.

Thank you, my young friend

I've been following along. It took me a while to catch up today.

J

reply to post by XaniMatriX


Yes please make a thread, I am fascinated to read your theories about DNA manipulation in the womb by frequencies.

reply to post by MidnightTide


Maybe it will even be one of the first threads in the new forum! YEA!

www.abovetopsecret.com...




Well, now that we are back on topic, and have a few things straightened out, I will leave it up to my freinds here to continue the discussion without me for a while, I have a discussion going on elsewhere to which I must give my attention...

Happy discussing to you all!

Originally posted by EvilSadamClone
reply to post by LadyJae

 

You might want to read this wiki about it:

en.wikipedia.org...

Thank you for the link, ESC.

From that same link:

While Genesis 9 never says that Ham was black, he became associated with black skin, through folk-etymology deriving his name from a similar, but actually unconnected, word meaning "dark" or "brown".

I didn't think the Bible stated the nature of the curse.

J