It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Spotless
Tell me, can there be a gay christian ?
Originally posted by Spotless
Just because a human is different than you it doesn't make him anomaly of nature. You can fool yourself by saying its not discrimination, but it is. You really need a nice warm cup of COMMON SENSE.
"If gay people want a special word for thier unions"
They don't want a special word, they want the usual word.
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Originally posted by NullVoid
Gay marriage = civil partnership agreement. Nothing religious about it.
If you are going to go that route,
straight marriage = civil partnership agreement. The state is not a religious organization.
Originally posted by Spotless
reply to post by NullVoid
Tell me, can there be a gay christian ?
Keep in mind that first amendment mumbo jumbo, freedom of religion and stuff.edit on 27/7/2012 by Spotless because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MountainLaurel
I'm going to probably take a beating for stating my "honest" opinion on the subject of why I believe many people are hesitate or uncomfortable using the term "marriage" for gay couples in a civil union.
Gay marriage is not "exactly" the same thing as a marriage between a man and women...and infact while I personally could care less who anyone else loves, and what they call thier union.....I think to insist that wanting to marry someone of the same sex should be seen as being as "normal" as a marriage between a man and women...is to deny the obvious facts of nature....we could discuss all day why people are gay, but it certainly is a completely different thing then being black, white, etc., and I don't see it as discrimination to say that being gay is an anomoly of nature, and I would venture to say that many kids that grew up gay know this first hand, they were different from other kids, and I don't condone being being mean or cruel to anyone for being different, but it's a lie to say they aren't different, they are.
I could jump up and down because I can't join a black gentleman's club, still won't change the fact I'm a white female, and it's "thier" club, but I can certainly start my own club, and call it whatever I want....but it's never going to be a black gentleman's club, and why would I even want it to be one?
If gay people want a special word for thier unions, make one up.......but "marriage" is already taken by men and women......and anyone that has ever been married knows we earned it !
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by Spotless
Just because a human is different than you it doesn't make him anomaly of nature. You can fool yourself by saying its not discrimination, but it is. You really need a nice warm cup of COMMON SENSE.
Simply being "different" doesn't make one an anomaly of nature, but going expressly against the way nature has set things up DOES make one an anomaly of nature. Luckily, there is nothing natural about government, there is no "nature" in it, so government can do as it pleases in the matter of gay marriage.
"If gay people want a special word for thier unions"
They don't want a special word, they want the usual word.
I have an idea that works for me. Gays can have the "marriage" franchise altogether. I want nothing more to do with it, or the government sanctioned licensing scheme. I'll call mine a "Spiritual Union", and leave it at that. So there you go. have at it, and marry away. I'm backing out of the club, so do with it what you want. "What God hath joined together, let not man put asunder" - I'm not allowing them to license me in order to give them a say in what they sunder. gays can have the paper, right along with their newly-minted ability to "marry". I don't need it.
When gays decide they want my "Spiritual Unions", too, I reckon we'll have another problem. I may back out again, or I may not.
There is only so much backing up one can do.
Originally posted by MountainLaurel
If gay people want a special word for thier unions, make one up.......but "marriage" is already taken by men and women......and anyone that has ever been married knows we earned it !
When gays decide they want my "Spiritual Unions", too, I reckon we'll have another problem. I may back out again, or I may not.
1 Samuel 18:1,3
"And it came to pass, when he [David] had made an end of speaking unto Saul, that the soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul . . . And Jonathan and David made a covenant, because he loved him as his own soul."
And immediately afterward, Jonathan disrobed before David.
Ruth 1:16
But Ruth said:
“Entreat me not to leave you,
Or to turn back from following after you;
For wherever you go, I will go;
And wherever you lodge, I will lodge;
Your people shall be my people,
And your God, my God.
17 Where you die, I will die,
And there will I be buried.
The Lord do so to me, and more also,
If anything but death parts you and me.”