Originally posted by humphreysjim
Typical conspiracy theorist nonsense. One eye-witness gets the description correct and it's suspicious that she was so accurate, and others get it
wrong and it's suspicious how they got things wrong. Then on one hand the guy is being touted as a "genius", and then it's being implied a mere
science genius could not rig his house with explosives in such an impressive manner. It's double-standards all the way, making the facts fit the
conspiracy theory already decided upon, in whatever way necessary.
As for these "facts" being ignored by most, it's not that they're being ignored, it's more that most people are aware that in situations like
this the information gets muddled and messy, witnesses make mistakes, reporters make mistakes, we don't know the full story and due to the way things
work we probably never will.
This does not mean a conspiracy is the answer. Every single time something significant happens it's deemed a conspiracy here, there are no major red
flags in that top ten for me, just standard stuff expected in high profile cases like this.
edit on 26-7-2012 by humphreysjim because: (no
I agree with a lot of what you have pointed out.
But, there are a lot of things about this that don't make sense to me.
I too am intrigued by how a witness knows the color of a gas canister thrown into a dark theater playing a movie. Color distortion would be
everywhere, with smoke too, and chaos, as she's hitting the floor... That makes no sense to me AT ALL.
In a movie theater I can barely make out the color of the seat in front of me because it's dark, and the light from the screen alters the color and
tone of everything in the room. Color is not on an object, it is produced by the light the object receives and reflects/absorbs.
There is no chance in hell that the witness would have been able to accurately describe a gas canister under that scenario.
But, like you, I don't think this automatically means there is a conspiracy, it just means that their witness statement is null and void. Just like
the guy who said the shooter kicked the door in. He clearly didn't, and therefore the witness statement is not reliable and would not stand in
Other things, such as the witnesses who stated there was another gunman attempting to gain entry to theater 8, the gas mask outside that door, the
shattered window of the vehicle when Holmes put up no resistance, the police searching and watching another persons home - who still remains
missing... all of these things tell me that the Police are either hiding a lot of information, or there is something a lot deeper going on here.
I don't fall for the typical BS about photos not being him (why would "they" do all of this and not just use a photo of the person they actually
intend to hold accountable?) about it being some kind of government operation or anything like that - we need some hard evidence to suggest something
But there is no denying that there are a lot of things about this that are not only worrying, they are downright terrifying.
IMO, we are not being told the truth about this. I also think that the reason for this is because the police do not want to admit that they got
something fundamentally wrong.