It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CajunMetal
At best the bootlegger used that image because he/she also saw the Anarchy symbol and decided it'd be sly to use that particular image, and at worse they snagged the first image that popped up in a google search.
But based on the screen grab from the movie said to represent a pentagram, it's clear that both were from the same set of photographs taken on that particular set. The common thread in both images is the metal scaffolding. Had the cameraman been standing two feet to the right or left there would be no pentagram or anarchy symbol since it's the support beams on either side of it, viewed through the center, that create the illusion (one bar going one way on one side and the other side a bar going the other way).
EDIT: because of the quality of the scanned image I thought the DVD graphic was a bootleg and corrected my mention of it here. I hardly see how imagery from the first movie has any bearing as a trigger for something that happend at the very first showing of a completely different movie.
To everyone's credit though, this movie has severe anti-99% themes and if nothing else it is dangerous propaganda meant to villain-ize those who would speak out against big banks and the 1%'s hold on the world.
CMedit on 10-8-2012 by CajunMetal because: and another thing!edit on 10-8-2012 by CajunMetal because: (no reason given)edit on 10-8-2012 by CajunMetal because: derp
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by Scope and a Beam
Well, considering most people try to explain away key evidence that doesn't add up, like the riot shield, and the second gas mask.... Or just outright ignore it..... Also the person at that point might not have been thinking precision, maybe something went wrong and all they were thinking was about getting the hell out of there.
Their agenda doesn't have to be gun control either, that is just one of the usual suspects. I am willing to accept maybe there wasn't an agenda at all, at least not a rational one. I am just saying there has been a bunch of evidence and witnesses casting a lot of doubt on the lone gunman theory.edit on Fri, 27 Jul 2012 20:12:08 -0500 by TKDRL because: (no reason given)