It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SFWatcher
Seriously....if you have EVER had the pleasure of getting a vessel insured for commercial use....that story would not hold water (no pun intended).
The paint and name in a ship have very little to do with what and how a vessel is insured.
Different back then? I would suspect otherwise. Maritime insurance is one of the oldest businesses in record -- and today's insurance documents are often based (depending in carrier) on laws of the seas that are literally "as old as time".
To imagine anyone insuring either of those vessels without knowing exactly WHAT they are insuring and WHAT happened to them is simply unthinkable....
Originally posted by SFWatcher
Seriously....if you have EVER had the pleasure of getting a vessel insured for commercial use....that story would not hold water (no pun intended).
The paint and name in a ship have very little to do with what and how a vessel is insured.
Different back then? I would suspect otherwise. Maritime insurance is one of the oldest businesses in record -- and today's insurance documents are often based (depending in carrier) on laws of the seas that are literally "as old as time".
To imagine anyone insuring either of those vessels without knowing exactly WHAT they are insuring and WHAT happened to them is simply unthinkable....
Originally posted by tpg47
To all you naysayers , watch and learn .
This subject has never been Debunked , as some would have you believe , because the evidence is just too overwhelming .edit on 27-7-2012 by tpg47 because: (no reason given)edit on 27-7-2012 by tpg47 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by BASSPLYR
If that theory made any sense with the olympic having a bad keel and not being sea worthy then why not just scheme to sink the olympic and not the titanic. Why even switch boats? Makes no sense.
Aren't there photos of the two ships side by side in the dock with the olympic much farther along in construction than the titanic. From the construction alone you can tell the differences in superstructure. THey were too different to be confused with a little switcheroo.
The conspiracy theory has never been debunked because it didn't hold enough wait to actually have anyone seriously consider it. It's stupid on several glaring levels.
Originally posted by Maxatoria
reply to post by Eurofile007
Remember the ship struck the iceberg going at a good rate of speed and this iceberg was basically an almost immovable object composed of solid ice weighing probably 1000's of tons in weight so those forces have to go somewhere and the steel plating wasn't thick enough or welded well enough to be able to absorb those sort of stresses so eventually i'd imagine as the ship his the iceberg the hull plates started to get crushed and the rivets popping under the stress
you can sort of replicate it by driving a car and skimming a tree along one side and see what sort of damage it does to your car since steel is harder than wood