posted on Jul, 26 2012 @ 08:59 AM
Originally posted by longlostbrother
reply to post by ZiggyMojo
First, it doesn't make it seem more suspicious unless you think the media is conspiring to lie to you about him room mates in CO.
Second, knowing there's two from Cali tells us nothing about the number of previous or subsequent roommates he's had.
First, it DOES make it seem more suspicious when they have a VERY easy explanation to use for their retraction but completely ignored their
responsibility as a credible news source to use it. Instead they erased the data as if it never happened. This actually would make them MORE liable if
someone did start to look for roommates and began harassing them. Without a retraction the statement they originally made is legally STILL true. There
was no clarification as to WHEN he had the roommates so technically it stands to reason that he could have had two during his period of planning.
I'm not under the impression that he did have roommates at that time as I have explained on several occasions.. But again.. I used this fact as an
example because of how blatantly obvious it was, and how pertinent it was to current events. You constantly offer your opinion as if it is fact.. When
much of what you say is subjective.
Second of all I said that my subsequent roommates postulation was nothing more than speculation because I knew someone would try to hold it against me
as if I was trying to expand on a conspiracy theory.
I don't know if you are just unable to thoroughly read my posts, but you seem pretty hell-bent on disagreeing with everything I say.. Even when I
leave the disclaimer that it is simply speculation. Speculation doesn't mean I believe it.. It simply means I'm speculating or exploring
possibilities. It is just as likely that he DID have subsequent roommates as it is that he didn't. If you can show me evidence otherwise.. PLEASE DO.
If you haven't realized this is a conspiracy forum and speculation does not mean anyone is claiming it as fact. Of course the media parades their
own speculation around as fact, so maybe you are getting confused.
Having a High Standard also means having the ability to see the issue from multiple perspectives. Narrowing your view to one perspective or story
isn't necessarily conducive to revealing all truths.
Also.. Let me explain one more time.. The whole point of this thread is to expose the awful journalism practices of the MSM. To show the reader that
the story can change right before your eyes without you ever noticing. Through time, an entire story can be altered to portray a totally different
scenario, and no one would be any wiser unless they did their due diligence and researched it themselves. We were warned about this happening and
guess what.. it is. I have shown you that a story can change without any record or explanation. That is a SERIOUS problem for research, and study..
Especially those looking back at something down the road.