It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
SO once you've come to the point you are willing to admit he existed as a person.
Than you either have what the First books say as fact, or you don't
Here is some super fine reading for you -
Exposing the tragic fabrication of a saviour of the world
Originally posted by wildtimes
Just saying. Someone, please, show me reliable evidence for the truth! I have seen an online "letter" from an Essene brother who took the time to explain what really happened...that Joseph of A and Nicodemus made a deal with Pilate....and the Roman centurion in charge went along with it.
so Jesus rolled the rock from his tomb after waking from a nap brought on by Roman crusifiction ?
Fairly certain the type of wounds one would get from such a thing would not allow someone to do that.
I mean if you want to admit to his existence, than we have to treat it forensically?
Could you find that and cite it, that would be helpful. I knew nothing of that letter, but this is what I've deduced myself, something to that effect anyway.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by AdamsMurmur
He argues against it being an actual historical event.
I also like to point out that he was on the cross for 3-6 hours. People survive on a cross for longer than that (up to a day or two).
I am led to believe this as well. From non-scriptural sources. I am also led to surmise that the Essene followers of his contracted with Pilate to bring him down early (Pilate wanted to pardon him), so that they might treat him for his injuries.
I do not believe his heart was pierced, or his bones broken.
Just saying. Someone, please, show me reliable evidence for the truth! I have seen an online "letter" from an Essene brother who took the time to explain what really happened...that Joseph of A and Nicodemus made a deal with Pilate....and the Roman centurion in charge went along with it.
Hence, my confusion.
I've found plenty of support for the "swoon" theory, actually, from studying non-Christian writings and such. What we know of resurrection is that it takes a long time (days), and the fact that he was taken down a few hours after his being pinned up there gives credence to the concept that he was not really dead...
Originally posted by AdamsMurmur
reply to post by wildtimes
Let me tell you something pretty cool.
ODIN was hung on the world tree (but upside down) for 9 days. He "sacrificed himself unto himself." He was also pierced in the side by his own spear.
Sound familiar?
Originally posted by AdamsMurmur
reply to post by wildtimes
Let me tell you something pretty cool.
ODIN was hung on the world tree (but upside down) for 9 days. He "sacrificed himself unto himself." He was also pierced in the side by his own spear.
Sound familiar?
I guess the point is that they assimilated the people's beliefs, and turned them into Christian ones. Christmas, Easter, that story of Odin, and whatever else out there, all come from other people's beliefs. They tried very hard to reconcile the different religions in the world, and so it's logical to say that they just absorbed some of the core beliefs and made them their own. It's like putting the cross atop an obelisk or a "pagan" place of worship.