It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
Legalizing prostitution could not possibly make those issues any worse, and it is hoped that they will make them better.
Originally posted by Biliverdin
Originally posted by boncho
Can you explain why women have the oxytocin bonding process during labour and men have nothing similar? Or why men don't give birth, essentially why humans are not an asexual species?
What does that have to do with anything? How about you show me a study that shows that men are genetically pre-programmed to spread their seed? Women bond and are biologically encouraged to bond because our young cannot fend for themselves. That has nothing to do with creating the child in the first place, so I have really no idea where you're coming from with that angle
questionnaires at the end of each 4-week period while sexual activity and mood states were recorded by daily dairies and self-rating scales. In both groups there was a significant increase in scores in the Psychosexual Stimulation Scale of the SES (i.e. SES 2) following testosterone administration, but not with placebo. There were no changes in SES 3, which measures aspects of sexual interaction with the partner. In both groups there were no changes in frequency of sexual intercourse, masturbation, or penile erection on waking nor in any of the moods reported.
Originally posted by Biliverdin
Originally posted by getreadyalready
Legalizing prostitution could not possibly make those issues any worse, and it is hoped that they will make them better.
I was addressing a particular point that spiramirabliss made, but since you make the claim, how?
BUT, since we're here..... are you saying sexual attraction is not rooted at all in biology? It is purely intellectual in nature?
If you're saying that, then you are not going to be too popular in the homosexual discussion realm. They are arguing very vehemently about "nature" instead of "nurture."
Legalising prostitution does nothing to target human sex trafficking or child prostitution.
The sole purpose of legalisation, given that in many countries it is legal for an individual to profit from the sale of their own body, is to allow others to legally run brothels and therefore profit from the sale of other people's bodies.
Originally posted by Biliverdin
reply to post by Spiramirabilis
Okay I will concede, but with the caveat that while sex does serve an important social and belonging function, depending upon the society, it can equally be incredibly harmful to social cohesion, and highly devisive.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
BUT, since we're here..... are you saying sexual attraction is not rooted at all in biology? It is purely intellectual in nature?
If you're saying that, then you are not going to be too popular in the homosexual discussion realm. They are arguing very vehemently about "nature" instead of "nurture."
Originally posted by getreadyalready
But, I'll humor you and give a quick rundown of If Prostitution were legal.....
Let me preface by saying that I have heard just about every prosecuting attorney in my field of work, all the way up to the top of their departments saying they wish prostitution were legal. They also qualify their statement with the words, "but it will never happen, because of the religious element in the population." Even the prosecutors realize our prisons are full of the wrong people, and our cops are spending billions of hours and dollars chasing so-called criminals that are not hurting anybody except maybe themselves. Victimless crimes are really not crimes at all.
Now, after that preface, if we were to legalize prostitution, we could regulate the industry the same way we regulate medicine, chiropractic, massage, tattoos, etc.
1. Streetwalking, and "soliciting" would still be illegal.
2. "Legal" prostitution would be in establishments, that would require licensing by the state and local municipality, and requirements of licensure would be regular inspections, employment files readily available for every employee, environmental controls, tax returns, signage outside with posted hours, adequate security, processes and procedures outlined to limit infectious disease, etc.
3. The employees in the establishments would also have to be licensed, and that licensure would require semi-annual blood tests, proper photo identification on a displayed license, and also readily available for each girl, as well as proper knowledge of he processes and protocols for infectious disease and environmental controls. They would have to test, and take continuing education hours like any other licensed profession.
Just those two things alone, which are already common things in the massage industry, and the porn industry, would drastically improve the oversight and regulation and give authorities an inside look at what is going on. It would provide workers a safe and voluntary haven to make their living, and provide lawful customers a safe haven to spend their money, and the competition could put pressure to drive the illegal venues out of business.
The licensure and inspection fees would also fund an entity like the one I work for, who could investigate claims of unlicensed activity, and supplement the law enforcement efforts in those areas. More people looking into the seedy establishments means more chance of protecting the victims of forced sex, or human-trafficking.
Allowing lawful establishments also removes some of the taboo, and all of the risk of reporting risky behavior. Right now, if a man hires a prostitute, and he has a feeling she is a victim of something terrible, reporting it would put him at risk also. If the trade were legalized, the customers would be free to report problems, abuse, and trafficking without fear of being arrested. Again, more people looking into this area is more protection for the would-be victims.
Allowing lawful practice of the trade also opens up the opportunity for women to advertise a little bit, be more discerning with their customers, and more open about their pricing, expectations, dos and don'ts. The way it is now, the women are afraid every customer is a vice officer, and so they are forced into back alleys and seedy hotels. Abortion used to be the same way. Abortion was legalized to protect women from seedy operations that were a necessity when it was illegal, why is prostitution any different?
That is just a brief snapshot, but one that I can assure you has been discussed at many levels of law enforcement, medical boards, and federal police task forces. The issue is a real issue, and the solution is a real solution, but it is being blocked by the religious do-gooders, just like abortion once was.
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
It bothers you that some people are making money off other people's bodies - I understand. It's going to continue as long as we have bodies - so - once we get done moralizing - what's the best solution?
Consenting adults - actual consenting adults - should be allowed to do what they want - legally
Otherwise we let it remain illegal - and we keep punishing the women while simultaneously allowing them to be completely vulnerable
Originally posted by Biliverdin
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
It bothers you that some people are making money off other people's bodies - I understand. It's going to continue as long as we have bodies - so - once we get done moralizing - what's the best solution?
Consenting adults - actual consenting adults - should be allowed to do what they want - legally
Otherwise we let it remain illegal - and we keep punishing the women while simultaneously allowing them to be completely vulnerable
As mentioned above, while in the UK it is legal to prostitute yourself, and many do work independently from flats etc. That does nothing to diminish illegal sex trade, both in terms of soliciting, and those who profit from others. Those operating illegally, remain unprotected. All morality aside, if we were to completely legalise trade in sex then perhaps there would be some over-riding protection for the workers, but until that time, all that partial control does is legitimise some by further marginalising others.
On that note, I must go to bed...but thanks to all, it's been fun
One day you or your daughter may not have a choice, One day they may force your child into prostitution,
The U.S. Department of Justice estimates that, “293,000 American youth are currently at risk of becoming victims of commercial sexual exploitation” (USDJ). Teenage girls are lured into illegal and forced prostitution at young ages by men and boys known as “pimps” who use the girls’ vulnerable pasts to coerce them into “the life.” The pimp targets at-risk American teenagers with histories of trauma and through a specific cycle, turns a young girl into a commodity to be bought and sold, solely for his selfish gain. The cycle includes recruitment, retention, intimidation and addiction, running away, and returning to the pimp. The only way for American domestic human trafficking to end is through awareness and outreach to at-risk teenagers before they are targeted in their own neighborhoods by traffickers.
The young woman with a sweet face walked to the lectern, past the man who had forced her to become a prostitute at age 12.
She paused, took a breath and explained to the federal judge how it felt to have Datqunn Sawyer take brutal and complete control of her, brand her with a tattoo and force her to "walk a track" as a child prostitute.
Originally posted by Ladysophiaofsandoz
When guys go to a strip joint the girls pay attention to them everything he says is interesting or funny. They are paying for the attention and interaction as much as they are paying to see girls strip. Guys will pay $20 for some dried up old chicken wings because some girl in a tight shirt and short shorts smiles at them and makes them feel special for a bit. No one is judging them. What is expected of them and what they are getting in exchange is clear.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Well I'll tell you what, I would "love" her enough to get her out of the business of selling her body.
Would you expect me to "love" my daughter enough to get her out of the business of selling her body as a housekeeper too?
OH please, there is a big difference between prostitution and house cleaning, give me a break.
If you are saying it wouldn't matter, then that's sad.edit on 043131p://bWednesday2012 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)
I asked for confirmation that men are genetically programmed to 'spread their seed', not confirmation of the role of hormones.
...but where does any of that say that men are genetically programmed to 'spread their seed'?
Research article: Evolution and the psychology of intergroup conflict: the male warrior hypothesis
Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B March 5, 2012 367 1589 670-679; 1471-2970
Wars, brawls, defense budgets, riots: All of these aggressive male by-products are genetically rooted in men's drive to win as many mates as possible, according to British scientists. A study published this week blames the world's conflicts on this male "tribal" attitude, saying it "might not be functional in modern times and [is] often counterproductive," Global Post reports via the Telegraph.