Children of the Drone, page 1


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 19 times


reply posted on 24-7-2012 @ 08:56 AM by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by Kangaruex4Ewe



Sadly, there are people who "win" in these situations since they are not culpable for their actions. The losers are the mangled children who are caught in the middle of this fraud of a "war".

You are right, war has no winners, but this is not a real war.



reply posted on 24-7-2012 @ 10:06 PM by Xoanon

From AskTheAnimals' post above...

"The winners are the manufacturers of drones and missiles."


In the same spirit I would like to post this video for us. It is what shocked me into trying to understand the Drone situation. Because of this vid I became interested in the Ethical Adaptor, one of the software components of the computer systems that will someday soon run these drones. It is being developed now at Georgia State University by
Ronald C. Arkin for a time, likely in the very near future, when these bots will run autonomously.



A quote from the video's creator, John A. Butler...



“I’ve been very interested in all aspects of what is now branded as the Long War, which I see as a war between Finance and Humans, rather than East versus West, Capitalism versus Islam, or whatever.

A military invasion to secure resources and a financial austerity package to placate bondholders are all part of a unified process. It’s just that force is applied in a somewhat cruder manner in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan and Africa.

What I’ve done is transposed the action to the Homeland, where it will eventually arrive anyway. The Drones are Chamber of Commerce assets, part of the elite Milton Friedman Unit.”

dangerousminds.net...



X.
edit on 24-7-2012 by Xoanon because: .




reply posted on 25-7-2012 @ 04:40 AM by RealSpoke
reply to post by Xoanon



That vid is so creepy.

reply to post by Corruption Exposed



I should have said sloppy regardless

edit on 25-7-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 25-7-2012 @ 05:18 PM by Xoanon
reply to post by RealSpoke




It sure is. The link I provided to Arkin's paper is even creepier...


In a recent survey on people’s attitudes regarding autonomous robots capable of lethal force , the inclusion of the moral emotion of guilt was recommended by almost half of the respondents when considering a robot capable of lethal force, with only compassion occurring at a higher level. Our research group has extensive experience in
the design of autonomous agents possessing artificial affective functions...

The Ethical Adaptor operates at two primary levels:
1. After-action reflection, where reflective consideration
and critiquing of the performance of the lethal robotic
system, triggered either by a human specialized in
such assessments or by the system’s post-mission
cumulative internal affective state (e.g., guilt or
remorse), provides guidance to the architecture to
modify its representations and parameters. This
allows the system to alter its ethical basis in a manner
consistent with promoting proper action in the future.

2. Run-time affective restriction of lethal behavior,
which occurs during the ongoing conduct of a
mission. In this case, if specific affective threshold
values (e.g., guilt) are exceeded, the system will cease
being able to deploy lethality partially or in totality.

www.cc.gatech.edu...
edit on 25-7-2012 by Xoanon because: .

Pages:     ^^TOP^^