It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But of course they would be prevented from rising to the top because people would be well informed and involved into state affairs unlike today where people are blinded by MTV and Hollywood.
Originally posted by Destinyone
reply to post by Jepic
Ahhhh you forget your own words....one homogenous society. Excludes individuals. The very same individuals you claim would be aberrant in denying you the air you need to survive. In your perfect little world, everyone would think the same. So, it would be a collective action killing you, not an individual. Checkmate....
Des
But of course they would be prevented from rising to the top because people would be well informed and involved into state affairs unlike today where people are blinded by MTV and Hollywood.
Originally posted by AkumaStreak
Originally posted by Jepic
Originally posted by AkumaStreak
Originally posted by Jepic
Originally posted by AkumaStreak
reply to post by Jepic
Much of what you speak of is based on complex non-absolutes. For example, what ideologies are acceptable and which are not? Who's to decide? Who's to judge the deciders?
What you describe also sounds really expensive. Ongoing nationwide evaluations for gun owners? Again, why not cure cancer or solve motor vehicle fatalities? Bee stings kill more people per year than domestic terrorism.
There is a lot of value in having a society full of fear, however. Unless you're not going to benefit from that, you're simply not doing sound logic/math.
Nice. I like it. You have made me renew my plan. My new plan is as follows.
1. Divert some of that massive defense spending to eliminate classes and create one homogeneous class. Everyone has more than enough to have a nice house and then some. This will reduce if not eliminate crime because well people won't have a reason to resort to crim in the first place.
PROBLEM SOLVED.
There are plenty of people who will not be happy with a decent house and then some. They'll want more and then they'll want more after that. Unbridled greed of a minority is one of the biggest problems in the world... your plan doesn't address this.
Also only some crime equates to robbery... there's plenty of other kinds of crime, so no, there will still be crime.
Don't quit your day job to become Mr. Problem Solver.
Well that's too bad then is it. They will just have to be like everyone else and enjoy their lifes like everyone else. And if they try to get more power then they will be stopped by the majority. SIMPLEZ.
Interesting, since that's exactly where we are today. And the majority is doing nothing, individuals are all but powerless. Not simple at all...
Originally posted by CynicalWabbit
reply to post by Jepic
But of course they would be prevented from rising to the top because people would be well informed and involved into state affairs unlike today where people are blinded by MTV and Hollywood.
Tell me, where is this ivory tower that you live in ? I'd like to visit with a wrecking ball and give you a dose of reality
Originally posted by BenReclused
reply to post by Jepic
But of course they would be prevented from rising to the top because people would be well informed and involved into state affairs unlike today where people are blinded by MTV and Hollywood.
I DO agree that the largest problems in this old World are caused by the ignorance of the masses. How is anything you've said, to this point, going to change any of that?
See ya,
Milt
Originally posted by CynicalWabbit
reply to post by Jepic
You sir are the ignorant one, what makes you think that everyone would want you're vision of Utopia. Do you think that you are so mentally superior that you can speak for the 7 billion people in the world with 7 billion different needs and 7 billion different dreams.
We'll all have a pot of gold with exactly an equal number of pieces in each pot. We'll finally all be perfect...hippies
Originally posted by Destinyone
Originally posted by CynicalWabbit
reply to post by Jepic
You sir are the ignorant one, what makes you think that everyone would want you're vision of Utopia. Do you think that you are so mentally superior that you can speak for the 7 billion people in the world with 7 billion different needs and 7 billion different dreams.
In Jepic's perfect little world, we'll all live under rainbows and ride unicorns......
We'll all have a pot of gold with exactly an equal number of pieces in each pot. We'll finally all be perfect...hippies....
Des
edit on 24-7-2012 by Destinyone because: (no reason given)
Do people want peace? My "utopia" offers peace.
Do people want financial security? My "utopia" offers them financial security.
Do people want to be educated and full of knowledge? My "utopia" offers them education and knowledge.
Do people want to explore the stars? Hell! Of course! My "utopia" offers them exploration to the stars and beyond.
To refuse my way, is to refuse what mankind has strived for since the beginning of its conception. To refuse my way, is to be happy with the problems of today.
Well I'll tell you that a utopia is the only way to achieve peace in this world. So if humans refuse to live in a utopia, it means humans don't really want to live in a peaceful world, for which fact I won't lose a millisecond of sleep over.
Originally posted by Jepic
Don't know where else to post this, so of course move it if there is a more appropiate forum.
Now we all know this gun control problem there seems to be and after some time thinking a great idea popped into my head.
What if we make the need of having a PHD a basic requirement for owning a weapon. Just to be clear I'm not saying anyone with a PHD should automatically be granted a gun. I mean it should just be a basic requirement to owning a gun and from there of course, further requirements would be to undergo a background check and then some mental tests. After if you are deemed safe, responsible, mature you get any gun you want.
So just to go into more detail here is my plan for the requirements a person would need to have a gun.
1. A PHD in any subject.
2. A wife/husband with at least an undergraduate degree.
3. A stable and happy social circle and social life.
4. At least one son/daughter.
There is my plan. Because if you think about it. Someone without a university education should not own a firearm. And if my plan was implemented neither would he have to own one because you can be certain he won't be massacred by a happy doctor or happy philospher for that reason.
With my plan only people with maturity, responsibility, and respect would have a firearm. You can be certain a shooting such as the Aurora massacre or any school shooting would be very rare.edit on 23/7/12 by Jepic because: (no reason given)