It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Given the actions of the Rockefeller family in providing support to the Bolshevik revolution, [4] their instrumental role in the spread of eugenics policies to Nazi Germany, [5] and David Rockefeller’s proud exclamation, “Some.. believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others… to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it,” [6] it would seem that the solution of world government is rising out of crises that the proponents of such a system are fostering.
The Interchurch World Movement (1919 – 1920) In the aftermath of the bloody conflict of World War I, the League of Nations was presented as a solution to the horrendous problems that the world had witnessed. During the same time period that the League of Nations was formed, John D. Rockefeller Jr. launched the Interchurch World Movement (IWM) in 1919. [1] The Interchurch World Movement was the first attempt by Rockefeller to consolidate the churches into a corporate like structure which would exercise control over their activities. The “stability of government”, and the promotion of “harmonious relations” between people in an industrial society that the Rockefeller family was already dominating was a driving force behind the IWM
Samuel Zane Batten wrote a book titled “The New World Order”, published in 1919 by the American Baptist Publication Society. In this book, Batten paints a picture of a world entering a new phase in which a “new order” is rising out of the turmoil of World War. Batten proposed that a “world federation” be created which would be supported by an “international mind” and justified by a faith of “world patriotism.” “World patriotism must be a faith… There is no more justice for the claim of absolute sovereignty on the part of a nation than on the part of an individual… The only alternative is World Federation… with a world parliament… an international court… an international police force… Men must have an international mind before there can be a world federation. They must see and affirm that above the nation is humanity. Internationalism must first be a state of mind, an ideal, a chivalry, a religion, before it can be a reality and a system.” [1] [emphasis added]
The World Council of Churches (1948 – present day) The United Nations – which stands upon land that was donated by John D. Rockefeller Jr. – would replace the failed League of Nations in 1945 after World War II. The World Council of Churches continues to function to this day as an organization intimately aligned with the U.N. As with all previous attempts to centralize the churches, Rockefeller played a pivotal role with the WCC. Chateau de Bossey, located in Switzerland, functions as the World Council of Churches Ecumenical Institute. The institute was bought with money given to the WCC by John D. Rockefeller Jr. [1] During the 1961 third assembly of the World Council of Churches in New Delhi India, the agenda of world government and a new international order was once again revealed. Interdependence, surrender of national sovereignty, and regional institutions were all themes of the third assembly. Representatives from churches around the world were present, one of whom was Rev. H. N. Riber (U.S.A). Riber, as reported by the third assembly summary, “…desired paragraphs 61 and 62 [of the third assembly report] to be strengthened because Christians should be ahead of public opinion in requiring the nations to surrender sovereignty in preparation for world government.” [2]
Late Thursday, Angelos Angelou, principal executive officer of the consulting firm, AngelouEconomics, based in Austin, Texas, sent an e-mail to Commerce Lexington officials and the Herald-Leader apologizing for the report.
"I understand many cities are facing similar problems, but with the amount of money spent, it seems like we'd get a document specifically addressed to our environment," Self wrote on the ProgressLex site.
In the draft's executive summary, Self found the Bluegrass region's "first and most important" problem is also the same problem verbatim that the Pikes Peak region had.
Originally posted by RealSpoke
Where is any proof that any of this is happening? It's random text that you all are believing due to confirmation bias.
Originally posted by MRuss
reply to post by geobro
Why, everytime someone has something to share, must the peanut gallery line up to throw peanuts?
Did you know about Agenda 21, Mr. Big Shot?
If so, what exactly did you know about it?
It;s not like I'm trying to introduce the concept of the NWO. I am giving some people new information. If you already know, then back off and find something else to do.
Originally posted by olaru12
Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by olaru12
I think first step for Americans is do not let them take away our 2nd amendment rights and leave us defenseless.
Do not let the bankrupt towns take control of the mortgages like the towns in Cali want to do, that is just a step closer to them turning the land over to the UN.
Just how in the hell are they going to confiscate 270 million guns? Ain't gonna happen!
www.reuters.com...
imo this is just rightwing BS scare tactics. They can't even begin to stop the legal sale of firearms.
Originally posted by Skewed
reply to post by DaRAGE
Video fixed.
Not sure about the stars, they mean nothing to me. You can have what ever I have if you want them.
Enjoy.
edit on 23-7-2012 by Skewed because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Skewed
reply to post by Ex_MislTech
Would it be wrong to propose that I would give the first person $100 that delivers to me the American Flag that is flying at the UN building?
TextLady Michele Renouf takes us through the FREEMASON DECEIT to make it clear that the 2012 logo does not represent "2012" - but "ZION". This fact must be obvious even to a child that the logo represents "ZION" not "2012" as we have deceitfully been led to believe. Thus, the "London Olympics 2012" logo represents a DECEIT Note how a Secular Spell of Sorcery/ Witchcraft/ Freemasonry has been cast against the people of the UK. Freemason design - paid One million dollars ($1,000,000) - WOLFF OLINS - were they not in a very secure position to "win" this particular "competition"?
In 1993, to help explain the far-reaching aspects of the plan, the UN published "Agenda 21: The Earth Summit Strategy to Save Our Planet." Here's how the UN described Agenda 21 in that document: "Agenda 21 proposes an array of actions which are intended to be implemented byevery person on earth...it calls for specific changes in the activities of all people... Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all humans, unlike anything the world has ever experienced."
Originally posted by RealSpoke
Where is any proof that any of this is happening? It's random text that you all are believing due to confirmation bias.
Originally posted by DaRAGE
I don't understand what is so horrible about this Agenda 21.
Can someone please clarify why Agenda 21 is bad at all, because from what I have been reading from both of these sources below; is that it is good and beneficial to all
Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by Golf66
If you read further into the UN Agenda 21 plan you will find a greatly reduced population world wide .