It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Evildead
reply to post by AussieAmandaC
Years of personal terror does not justify taking others out. He should've just killed himself.
If it was my daughter who was senslessly murdered by him I'd want to end his life myself.
Wouldn't you if it had been your daughter?
As far as his soul, that's up to God.
If you rob someone of their life why should you have the pleasure of life?
Eye for an eye.
Originally posted by Libertygal
He may well have taken the foray into insanity, but by the same token, he knew what he was doing was wrong, thereby negating the entire insanity defense. Knowing the difference between right and wrong.
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by jiggerj
Surely, you've been around people that are 50 years old and can barely read? How about those between 20 and 40 that have no idea what's going on in the world because they don't pick up a newspaper or watch the news? The only way someone can improve physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually, is they have to WANT to. If they don't want to, then can you see how your belief is only good for you and in no way represents the rest of mankind.
You seem to be labouring under the misconception that you have free will. "Leading edge" neuroscience says that there is no such thing. Neuroscience vs philosophy: Taking aim at free will
Originally posted by 0zzymand0s
reply to post by jiggerj
Watching the news doesn't help you "know" or understand the world. In fact -- I gave up TV altogether at the age of 38. Do you know what I did in place of TV? I started pursuing degrees in philosophy and physics.
TV news is 100% corporate propaganda. There is nothing worth knowing in "the news."
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by jiggerj
Surely, you've been around people that are 50 years old and can barely read? How about those between 20 and 40 that have no idea what's going on in the world because they don't pick up a newspaper or watch the news? The only way someone can improve physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually, is they have to WANT to. If they don't want to, then can you see how your belief is only good for you and in no way represents the rest of mankind.
You seem to be labouring under the misconception that you have free will. "Leading edge" neuroscience says that there is no such thing. Neuroscience vs philosophy: Taking aim at free will
I don't understand. How does my reply come even close to implying free will? If people don't have it in them to WANT to do anything, this takes all control out of their hands.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Surely, you've been around people that are 50 years old and can barely read? How about those between 20 and 40 that have no idea what's going on in the world because they don't pick up a newspaper or watch the news? The only way someone can improve physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually, is they have to WANT to.
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by jiggerj
Surely, you've been around people that are 50 years old and can barely read? How about those between 20 and 40 that have no idea what's going on in the world because they don't pick up a newspaper or watch the news? The only way someone can improve physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually, is they have to WANT to. If they don't want to, then can you see how your belief is only good for you and in no way represents the rest of mankind.
You seem to be labouring under the misconception that you have free will. "Leading edge" neuroscience says that there is no such thing. Neuroscience vs philosophy: Taking aim at free will
I don't understand. How does my reply come even close to implying free will? If people don't have it in them to WANT to do anything, this takes all control out of their hands.
"The only way someone can improve physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually, is they have to WANT to."
Wanting or not wanting something implies an available choice, and your tone indicates some dismissal of those that don't want to improve themselves.
But it's not their fault... it's not like they don't want to improve themselves... the chemicals in their brain just don't want to
but I've seen kids where I could tell by the look on their faces that they just don't have it in them to strive.
Originally posted by XxRagingxPandaxX
reply to post by KillerQueen
This is dangerous reasoning. I'm a huge believer in self development. Constantly striving to improve physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually. If you believe this then you've doomed yourself, there is in essence no room for growth which is just non sense. This is just the classic nature vs. nurture argument. Just my opinion.