It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by intrptr
Originally posted by woodwytch
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by Rewey
Cant' wait to hear his excuse. It would only be the umpteenth time in this thread that he has not provided this and other data requests. He always has a pat answer like, my mother is using the computer, I am on the road, I am at the beach. What'll it be this time?
Hilarious intrptr ... most of us have a life off ATS you know ... maybe you should try it sometime
The OP has done an amazing job in this thread and his manners are impecable ... he is a credit to ATS membership and it's a true shame there are not more like him both here and in the 'real world' (that's the place not on the internet FYI) ... it's really not cool to be such a 'jobsworth' makes you come across as blinkered and anally retentive ... the guys on holiday and he's still posting when he can ... give him a break and relax a little.
Woody
Ha ha ha. Now you funny too. I can tell because you use smiley faces a lot. You are "amazed" by the OP's "job" on ATS? So you have met him, I guess? Know what he's really like? Okaaay...
Just checking the reality of your online statements about the real world in which you say you live. But how do I know what your life is really like? We haven't met either. You think total strangers are "Amazing". Thats fine. I look at the evidence and the claims. Given enough time anyone can talk themselves into a corner. Two pictures, one of alcohol and pots and the other taken by an inebriated relative of the OP is not evidence. I played along for awhile but I bow out now. Sure your amazing belittling, demeaning self will miss me.
"People? Don't lie. Because you can't remember stuff you said yesterday." --- Whoopie Goldberg
Originally posted by DonaldD
Wow 33 pages almost finished reading!
I tried to get a close up of this chap. It appears he has his head turned away - more looking into he corner of the door. It also appears that he is wearing glasses.
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Originally posted by DonaldD
Wow 33 pages almost finished reading!
I tried to get a close up of this chap. It appears he has his head turned away - more looking into he corner of the door. It also appears that he is wearing glasses.
That is what I was saying. I think he's looking at that little statue of the dog in the corner.
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Originally posted by DonaldD
Wow 33 pages almost finished reading!
I tried to get a close up of this chap. It appears he has his head turned away - more looking into he corner of the door. It also appears that he is wearing glasses.
That is what I was saying. I think he's looking at that little statue of the dog in the corner.
Originally posted by scubagravy
What is that is blacked out on the left, left of the red toy ??? The focus for me is there.
This intriguing photo, taken in 1919, was first published in 1975 by Sir Victor Goddard, a retired R.A.F. officer. The photo is a group portrait of Goddard's squadron, which had served in World War I at the HMS Daedalus training facility.
An extra ghostly face appears in the photo. In back of the airman positioned on the top row, fourth from the left, can clearly be seen the face of another man. It is said to be the face of Freddy Jackson, an air mechanic who had been accidentally killed by an airplane propeller two days earlier. His funeral had taken place on the day this photograph was snapped. Members of the squadron easily recognized the face as Jackson's. It has been suggested that Jackson, unaware of his death, decided to show up for the group photo.
These two photos were taken in 1988 at the Hotel Vierjahreszeiten in Maurach, Austria. Several vacationers gathered for a farewell party at the hotel and decided to take a group photo. One of the party, Mr. Todd, set up is Canon film camera on a nearby table and pointed it at the group. (The table is the white band at the bottom of the photos.) He set the self-timer on the camera and hurried back to the table. The shutter clicked and the film wound forward, but the flash did not fire. So Todd set the camera for a second shot. This time the flash fired.
The film was later developed, and it wasn't until one of party members was viewing the photos that it was noticed that the first (non-flash) photo showed a somewhat blurry extra head! (In the sequence above, the second (flash) photo is actually shown first for the sake of comparison.) No one recognized the ghostly woman, and they could not imagine how her image appeared in the picture. Besides being a bit out of focus, the woman's head is also too large compared to the other vacationers, unless she is sitting closer to the camera, which would put her in the middle of the table.
The photo was examined by the Royal Photographic Society, the photographic department of Leicester University, and the Society for Psychical Research, all of which ruled out a double exposure as the cause.
Originally posted by Sparky63
reply to post by DancedWithWolves
My guess is that the "unknown woman" is the person who took the first photo. Then they asked a waitress or someone else to take a complete group photo. If you look at the beers in the two pictures you see that the glasses are almost empty in the 2nd picture. So some time had passed between the two. Also the two older women in the center back of the photo shifted position to allow for the extra body to fit in. They would not need to do so if the official story was true. Just my quick observation.
edit on 7/27/2012 by Sparky63 because: spelling & added comment
Originally posted by DonaldD
Wow 33 pages almost finished reading!
I tried to get a close up of this chap. It appears he has his head turned away - more looking into he corner of the door. It also appears that he is wearing glasses.
The "gremlin" is certainly lighting and contours of a black rubbish bag.edit on 27-7-2012 by DonaldD because: (no reason given)