posted on Jul, 26 2012 @ 01:54 AM
reply to post by longlostbrother
Did you even read the article.
And in Palm Beach it became clearer that Romney was unlikely to return — but would retain his title as chief executive officer and sole
Indeed, by remaining CEO and sole shareholder, Romney held on to his leverage in the talks that resulted in his generous 10-year retirement
package, according to former associates.
He was not a partner in the new private equity funds launched in 2000 and 2001, meaning he had no role in assessing new investments, his
partners said — a departure from his having previously had the final say on every deal.
Basically Romney had nothing to do with Bain and retained power to get a good severance deal. Exactly what he said. He is clearly a genius when it
comes to economics. When was the last time you got a 100% return on ALL your investments every single year. This article tries to discredit Romney
with its biased added opinions, but all the actual facts and quotes support Romney in every single way.
Bain’s funds nearly doubled investors’ money annually during Romney’s tenure.
edit on 26-7-2012 by OccamsRazor04 because:
(no reason given)