Originally posted by samerulesapply
Then why stop here? I'm looking over at my marshall amp...marshall is an anagram of "shall ram"...ram, goat...satan, shall ram...perhaps marshall
want to ram a goat down my throat? Oh my!
What makes you think your amp is manufactured by a completely innocent corporation anyway? Do you think there are innocent corporations?
The whole word reversed would be "llahsram", which could mean.. "Allah" and "Sram". They are not english words, but might mean something in
Your example is a bit faulty, because you take "shall ram", and then interpret "ram" as a goat. Then it would become "Shall goat". If you
interpret goat as being "satan", then it whould be "Shall satan". You can't make it "marshall wants to ram a goat down your throat" by any
logical way. You also can't make it "satan shall ram", because the "ram" is already used to make the satan-connection in the first place. At
best, you could only make it "satan shall".
Which would be quite logical, in meaning that Marshall is actually a corporation giving devil free hands to do whatever it wants.
Please notice, that Marshall also consists of two words: Mars + Hall. Hall of Mars? You know what god Mars is? That's right, it's the god of WAR.
So Mars Hall could actually refer to a WAR HALL, and as amplifiers are used to play a lot of heavy music and other very 'warlike' cacophony, this
would be quite accurate as well. Or it could mean that Marshall is the Mars Hall, which then releases all kinds of warlike things and disturbances
into the world.
As you can see, your main point is close to being correct - many things (not everything) CAN be interpreted into occultic and against humanity if you
dig deeply enough - but your interpretation was clumsy, childish, and completely unrealistic, and I don't think anyone who you try to mock would ever
stoop to that kind of a level. I have not seen such childishness in ATS, except in posts like yours, who try to mock things.
You also have to take into account that it might not be because "digging deep enough" necessarily always produces some kind of results by random
accident - it might be that there simply _ARE_ that many things in the world today that actually ARE meant to be masonic/satanic symbols, and that's
why it seems that you can take ANYTHING and see something evil in it. It's not because of the method, of because of wanting to see something evil in
everything - it's because there actually -are- so many things of such nature in the world today!
So to prove your theory correct, you can't take a "random" example like your Marshall amp, and simply assume it must be "innocent", because it's
"random" -- but you would have to take something that you KNOW FOR SURE is in fact completely, 100% pure and innocent. And if you can then twist and
turn THAT into a "NWO thing", then you have a case.
With something like Mars Hall, you certainly don't..
By the way, there's no way you can get "Marshall shall ram a goat" from that, and why would you use goat to mean a goat again, when you already
established it means 'satan'? Your example is devoid of logic and your example is poor, childish and badly executed, and your choice of target is
simply 'random', which means it's probably made by a corporation controlled by TPTB anyway.
Sure this is ATS, but surely there must be boundaries? If not, then someone should start a thread about marshall wanting to ram goats down our throat.
I know it's a stupid theory, but what the hell, it's ATS - it's what we do!
Why must there be boundaries? What kind of boundaries are you talking about?
Your theory is not only stupid, it's completely illogical and doesn't have any depth to it - it also targets ONE individual, without any basis or
reason to do so. Why would a corporation want to ram a goat down your specific throat? When you think of the logistics, cost and sheer impossibility
of it, you would have to have a really good backstory to back such up such a claim - what REASON would they have?
There doesn't have to be boundaries, everyone should be free to start ANY thread they want about ANYTHING.
Just because there doesn't have to be boundaries, doesn't mean anyone "SHOULD" start such a thread, however. Whyever would it? Lack of something
doesn't necessitate starting something else. What you are saying is just as logical as saying that your lack of sleep means someone should go hang
gliding tomorrow morning! What kind of logic is that?
No boundaries doesn't mean that someone should start a thread about your theory. It only means that you should be free to do so if you want. But it
also means that everyone should also be free to ADDRESS those claims in any way they see fit, and QUESTION theories, especially as stupid as yours (I
don't consider this an insult, because you have already proclaimed it's stupid).
Your attempt to mock and derail has failed.