It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
BEIRUT, Lebanon (AP) – The Syrian regime acknowledged for the first time Monday that it possessed stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and said it will only use them in case of a foreign attack and never internally against its own citizens.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Jihad Makdissi said the stockpiles are secure, in an apparent response to widespread international concerns that they could fall into the hands of the disparate bands of rebel forces fighting the government.
"No chemical or biological weapons will ever be used, and I repeat, will never be used, during the crisis in Syria no matter what the developments inside Syria," he said in conference broadcast on state TV. "All of these types of weapons are in storage and under security and the direct supervision of the Syrian armed forces and will never be used unless Syria is exposed to external aggression."
DAMASCUS, (SANA)- Foreign and Expatriates Ministry on Monday stressed Syria's stance that any chemical or biological weapons will never ever be used during the crisis in Syria notwithstanding the developments inside the country. A statement by the Ministry, read by spokesman Dr. Jihad Makdissi in a press conference, said that such weapons stocks are secured and directly monitored by the Syrian Armed Forces and would only be used in the case of external aggression on the country.
Originally posted by michael1983l
All the more reason to attack them.
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by SUICIDEHK45
If they are prepared to use such inhumane weapons as Chemical weapons then they are not fit to be in charge of a country. The geneva convention outlawed them a long time ago in international law. If we are to enforce international law then they must be eliminated.
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by Trajan
Napalm is no longer used by the US and the last time I looked holding stocks of nuclear weapons wasn't a violation of the geneva convention. Nobody is saying that the US or the West is squeeky clean, but I'd much rather have the US in charge of those weapons than somebody like Assad or Ahdinejamad(spelling).
Originally posted by Trajan
I hope Syria unleashes those weapons on their attackers. It will show the West that not everyone is going to bend over and bow down to them. It will show the West that they won't take another nation without a fight to make Iraq look like a walk in a park.
If Syria is attacked they are fully entitled to use everything in their arsenal to make the aggressors pay. If Israel and Turkey attack them then Syria should pump everything it has into the attackers' homelands and make them regret every thinking of attacking Syria.
Iran should do the same. Fit their warheads with EMPs and thermobaric war heads to neutralize their enemies defences first and then unleash chemical and more thermobaric war heads before sending in their air force to make some precision strikes.
such weapons stocks are secured and directly monitored by the Syrian Armed Forces and would only be used in the case of external aggression on the country.
Originally posted by Trajan
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by Trajan
No, not holding them but using them is, you used depleted uranium in tank rounds during Operation Iraqi Freedom.
They aren't the big 'boom thump whoosh' nuclear weapons we are normally given an example of but the weapons are still radioactive and composed of nuclear material.
thats silly to put them in the same categrory as "boom thump whoosh nuclear weapons"...
plus you know we use depleted uranium rounds in the A-10s 30mm cannon too, right?
Civilian uses include counterweights in aircraft, radiation shielding in medical radiation therapy and industrial radiography equipment and containers used to transport radioactive materials. Military uses include defensive armor plating and armor-piercing projectiles.
no where near the same thing, bad comparison...edit on 23-7-2012 by Dizrael because: (no reason given)
A Pentagon document reveals that an Iraqi dissident reported that 50 trucks crossed the border on March 10, 2003, and that his sources in Syria confirmed they carried WMD. These trucks have been talked about frequently and remain a mystery.
During the question-and-answer period and during a follow-up interview, Duelfer made several interesting statements to me that reinforced my confidence that such a transfer occurred, although we can not be sure of the extent of it.
General Georges Sada, the former second-in-command of the Iraqi Air Force, claimed in his 2006 book that he knew two Iraqi pilots that flew WMD into Syria over the summer of 2002, which came before a later shipment on the ground. I asked Duelfer if Nizar Nayouf or the two Iraqi pilots were spoken with.
Ha’aretz has revived the mystery surrounding the inability to find weapons of mass destruction stockpiles in Iraq, the most commonly cited justification for Operation Iraqi Freedom and one of the most embarrassing episodes for the United States. Satellite photos of a suspicious site in Syria are providing new support for the reporting of a Syrian journalist who briefly rocked the world with his reporting that Iraq’s WMD had been sent to three sites in Syria just before the invasion commenced.
The newspaper reveals that a 200 square-kilometer area in northwestern Syria has been photographed by satellites at the request of a Western intelligence agency at least 16 times, the most recent being taken in January. The site is near Masyaf, and it has at least five installations and hidden paths leading underneath the mountains. This supports the reporting of Nizar Nayouf, an award-winning Syrian journalist who said in 2004 that his sources confirmed that Saddam Hussein’s WMDs were in Syria.