reply to post by Dinogur
All righty then.
You know a lot of what people present as evidence doesn't really cut it for me, too much of it is open to too much countering and interpretation.
Lucky Larry and his "pull it", that thermite was used, that firefighters saw molten metal, that there were no desks and computers in the rubble
because either those things weren't in the building or they were turned to dust by exotic weapons etc. etc. etc.
One bit of evidence cited is the right wing gash on the North Tower being 'formed' like 6 seconds after the 'plane' impacted the face of the tower.
September Clues plays around with this timing thing, but I could say: "Well that's impossible if the plane went in 6 seconds before you bunch of
retards!! That's just burning fuel you see there 6 seconds later igniting! Duh! Stay off the internet the smart people are using it." See, countering
what first looks like solid evidence.
Now keeping all that in mind, check this out, for I go one level better than September Clues.
And do please check this out.
September Clues uses the Naudet 'Fireman's Video' for their 6 second right wing gash creation thing and I'm going to use that clip too, only an
earlier more critical evidence part of it.
In this clip as the 'plane' approaches the face of the North Tower a curious damage pattern appears on the side of the building. Where the very right
wing tip would hit the tower an isolated damage bump is seen forming, and even forming FROM INSIDE the tower towards the outside. I've not talked
about the forming of this bump much (yet) that would be getting ahead of myself.
I call the evidence I'm explaining to you here (that you could even show to your friend) 9/11: Proof of Deception. Because you only need ONE Proof.
The right wing bump I just mentioned forming is an ISOLATED instance, which when you think about it is IMPOSSIBLE. Why? Because the "wing tip" is not
an isolated entity, no, it's connected to a big long wing. You crash a plane headlong into something flat and vertical, the wings are not going to
form isolated damage bumps far out by the tips! That would be ridiculous. Right? Think it through.
But that impossible thing isn't even the main thing, no, it gets even better and more impossible!
In the Naudet clip of the North Tower hit the right wing tip isolated damage bump that appears to be coming out of the tower shows up as damage on the
face of the building BEFORE the engine on the very same right wing shows any damage on the building!! You understand?
Why is that super-duper IMPOSSIBLE and PROVES DECEPTION? Simple.
The wings on a 767 are tapered back 37 degrees and the engines on each wing, if you view a 767 in plan view, can be seen to be placed far ahead of the
wing tips. THEREFORE, the engines on a 767 would impact the face of the tower and cause damage going in before damage from the wing tips was even
created or apparent.
When you look at the Naudet clip HOWEVER, and do so, get the best copy of the Naudet North Tower hit you can find and go through it a FRAME AT A TIME,
watch the right wing tip impact the building (actually coming from inside damage) before the right engine even gets to the building. That's what I
like to call hard impossible evidence.
Just look at my avatar pic, see that isolated right wing "bump" that is IMPOSSIBLE. THAT proves that the right wing gash on the North Tower was NOT
made by the wing of a 767 aircraft.
And that constitutes concrete Proof of Deception.
The Official Story claims that a 767 impacted the North Tower. You can conclude otherwise by carefully examining what I lay out here.
The physics of the damage pattern on the face of the North Tower displayed in the Naudet video does not support the Official Story narrative.
edit on 22-7-2012 by NWOwned because: number