posted on Jul, 23 2012 @ 12:13 PM
People bring cars and pencils and whatnot into discussion when comparing guns...
Those things are not meant to be used as a weapons, but it has potential. Gun is bought with the intention to shoot and kill, whether you want to call
it being defensive or protection is bs. If a guy with a gun want to shoot you, whether you have one on you or not, you are already dead, he wanted to
kill you and you have no way of knowing beforehand.
People who wants rules on gun dont want to take it out from your hands, YOU HAVE TO EARN THE GUN. If some people i know had access to gun, lot of
people would have been dead.
But, when comparing countries without gun and America, its totally different. i get you guys, there is already millions of guns in the
citizen/criminals alike, taking it back now means criminals won;t hand over, but it could be reduced. police could check all the records and people's
background, crime history, age limit, whether they need a gun or not etc etc.
But defending murder with guns is not the fault of the gun is just stupid. Humans use guns, humans are easily swayed with emotion, and gun is easily
used, and from a good deal of distance. I rather have a fighting chance with a knife then get killed by a gun.
And also, why do 99% of the criminals use gun as their primary weapons? anyone?
You can have your gun, i don't care, but don't justify it as being something good for the economy/country. heck, i could say that about nuclear
weapons, anyone want to debate that?