Bush Won!!!

Originally posted by antipigopolist

Originally posted by ShadowXIX
If you think some movement can take on the Goverment Good luck
[edit on 10-10-2004 by ShadowXIX]

Some would call this the realist point of view. Others would call this the apathetic point of view. And others still would call this the act of surrender.
"3 viewpoints?!! I thought only 2 were allowed in this new government!"

I guess my point is. Your apathetic, ShadowXIX. And what exactly does this mean>>> "They only people that have actually done something other then talk are dead." I doubt you have a clue as to what you're talking about. Or is this some kind of veiled threat...if so...Shove it up your arse Cooler (seen the movie?)!


Sorry...but the fat greedy corrupt bastards of the world need to be held accountable and saying "All you guys do is talk" because you can't see beyond what is right in front of you, Shadow, is just another example of your ignorance and apathy.

[edit on 10-10-2004 by antipigopolist]

Im a Realist not apathetic if you go up against the US military you will lose and lose big. In the comming years US soldiers are going to become so deadly no army is going to want to face them let alone civilians. You will be like lambs to the slaughter.

Talk is all you people do there is no great movement on the horizen. Instead of talking about it on some internet forum why dont you do something. Timothy McVeigh did something look were it got him, he thought his actions would spark some great revolution and it got him nothing.

Take a look at the real world there is no great movement behind your ideals in America.

It's unfortunate that things have to be based so much on military strength... .

Kerry Crushed Bush with Independents in the second debate.

Oh my.

But let's keep that little secret in the restricted forum shall we?

See there are things Gallup and the media "horse race" fans want people to know...

Like it was close in some respects.

Sen. John Kerry and President George W. Bush battled each other to a virtual tie in Friday night's presidential debate, according to a random sample of 515 registered voters who watched the event. Forty-seven percent of viewers said Kerry did the better job; 45% picked Bush. Still, there was a modest shift in viewers' sentiments toward Bush on which candidate can better handle terrorism and Iraq, and a slight shift toward Kerry on who can better handle the economy. Clear majorities of viewers thought Kerry did better at expressing himself, and that Bush did better at demonstrating that he is tough enough for the job.

And things you must pay for a subscription to learn...

Like Kerry is winning over the Swing Voters. Big time!

Democrats rallied behind Kerry's performance by 87% to 8%, while Republicans rallied behind Bush's performance by a slightly smaller margin, 83% to 10%. But independents chose Kerry by a 16-point margin, 53% to 37%.

And also Gallup finally talking about their own sampling bias, like the rest of us have been all along....

The reason the overall figures show only a slight advantage for Kerry, despite his greater margin among his own party and winning the independent vote, is that the sample of viewers had more Republicans (38%) than Democrats (32%) or independents (30%).

Nothing like being proven right in an argument over a horse's dental problems, than by the horse's own mouth.

Of course, the Bush top notch advisors know all this... but the "camp" seems as duped as the media that Bush's best chance rests in rallying an already rallied base. Let's keep this to ourselves and let 'em keep thinking that shall we?

Get that frothy ugly extremist core motivated Mr. President! No need to soften up now. Damn the moderates! Full speed under!

PS - This now qualifies the general debate threads for a rewrite as "Kerry Won!!!" but again, Bush doesn't need to know that.

Our little secret.