It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by longlostbrother
reply to post by kyviecaldges
Lol, there's some seriously twisted language in this post.
"Because it's an executive order it's obviously applicable."
Ahh poor you.
Listen, go do some proper research and then you'll see how many lies the freeman idiots have told you.
Start by googling Freeman debunked.
Check all the refernces both sides give you (don't claim you have already... Hahaha)
This is a very dopey and very easily debunked BS theory.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by longlostbrother
Oh I do. However that isn't the same as the entire Department of Commerce. That is only one bureau.
Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution grants original jurisdiction to U.S. federal courts over admiralty and maritime matters, however that jurisdiction is not exclusive and most maritime cases can be heard in either state or federal courts under the "saving to suitors" clause.[8] There are five types of cases which can only be brought in federal court: Limitation of Shipowner's Liability, Vessel Arrests in Rem, Property arrests Quasi in Rem, Salvage cases, and Petitory and Possession Actions.
Estate: A large piece of landed property, esp in the country.
The whole of one's possessions, especially all the property and debts l
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by longlostbrother
Wikipedia is full of lies? O_O
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by Vitruvian
I was saying that more along the lines of him accusing all my links of lies..I thought wikipedia was an acceptable source to people like him
Originally posted by St Udiothe whole arguement of a valid 'birth certificate' or a 'certificate of live birth' is mootBarack or Barry, as the case may be... was birthed by an American citizen birth-mother who chose (at the time of birth) to not have a 'official document' made about the child...She determined what identity the child took... and for a time selected the Barack Hussein personna because it would have afforded the child the vast landscape of 'additional' opportunities which common 'black' families/households did not have access to....consider the civil-rights movement et al...the whole American system could be 'gamed/played' to her households desire the youthful Obama then gravitated with & towards the old '60s radicals/revolutionaries and was imbibed with Marxism and the evolved radical-revolutionary ideals of the former weather-underground radicals from the late '60s-erly '70s from what i read/heard the Ayers' took Barack as a 'Ward' and paid his way thru a 'Harvard' degree so as to make the young man a viable commodity on the social stage...the guy owes his fortune to a 'affirmative action' era in America and the mentorship of anti-constitutionalist socialists/progressives intent on destroying the government of the USA... (imho)
Originally posted by longlostbrotherreply to post by Vitruvian
As far as I can tell nothing Wayne Madsen says is in fact backed up by the article you say it's from, namely:
www.namebase.org... Madson is NOT a trustworthy source.