Originally posted by Akragon
Fortunatly the trinity is unbibical... and those that actually read the bible can clearly see that fact...
The only ones that believe in this Trinity are those that are part of some organized religion... even most bibical scholars know and confirm that the
trinity was clearly added 300 some odd years later.
I wouldn't worry about the ramblings of Christian Fanatics my friend... Anyone who wants the truth just has to read what is written...
Either listen to the sheep, or listen to the shepard... sadly most listen to the sheep...
And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:
I don't think I can agree with all of that.
The Trinity is very Biblical, and the unforged version of Book of John gets is correct. Everyone has heard of the Vulgate edition of the Bible, in
Latan translation from Greek, and the scribble in the margin on Babylon's Trinity concept, then the reverse translation of the Latan to the Greek
again to get the forged information included as part of the Book of John. It is a pure and blatant forgery on the Book of John.
The forgery content is this:
5:7 "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
5:8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one."
The orginal content is:
" For there are three that bear record, the spirit, and the water, and the blood and these three agree in one "
There are several trinity themes in the religion history.
1. One is the forged Book of John version adding in the Babylon Trinity to Jesus.
2, The Original Book of John Trinity that is spirit, water, and blood.
3 The Sumerian Trinity of the triune gods of Anu, Enlil, Enki
The original book of John gets the symbolism going back to the Sumerian gods correct because the symbol for "the Father" or Enki is water, and the
Father gave Jesus his DNA and Blood via the genetic breeding of Adam and Eve and the line of decendency, and this lingers as the spirit of Enki in
John appears to correctly link what Jesus is speaking about in terms of being decended from Enki via blood and DNA. All the old themes on Enki
speak to his being the Creator god for humans and his symbol as the Father being water and semen. John, before the forgery, appeared to attempt to
impart the correct meaning. The problem is the forgers try to tie it to Nimrod as god theme, but both Nimrod and Jesus have the line of decendency
DNA of Anu, but that makes neither of them god, as not even the Anu are gods in a correct sense for today.
The forgery comes from the corruption of the Latan book via tossing in the Babylon Trinity of Nimrod, Tammuz, and Holy Spirit that tried to make
Nimrod and Tammuz into god. Nimrod had the very same blood and DNA as Jesus was proclaiming, and thus tried to play god with the production of a
nice blue tower of Babyl as a Ziggurat, and lots of water works that the Citys of Anu's methods used, and Babylon was a River Culture city.
Everyone tosses out Nimrod as being god because he is considered such a tyrant in the history, and to assign Jesus the same trinity is a major sin
against the memory for Jesus. However, in the vogue for the thinking of John going back to what was termed the Creator god Enki, the terms water,
blood, and spirit make sense and connect Jesus with Enki. So, there are some correct trinity and triune concepts that impart the real story.
Jesus also tells the very same blood and DNA connects others to Enki and what is within him is within others. All that supports the decendency line
from Enki and the Creation story of Adam and Eve via the genetic breeding that gave humans blood and DNA very similar to that of the gods of Anu, who
technically should not be termed gods. But that was the primitive vogue for how to speak about these advanced lifeforms that originated not from
One finds the rest of the story in the Book of Enoch, and the lines of decendency for the blood and DNA. One can trace the decendency from Adam, to
Cane, to Tubal Cane, to Abraham, to Enoch, to Noah, to Nimrod, to David, to Jesus, and on down. Not only does one find the Holy Blood theme, but
this blue eyes, blonde hair, and tall trait from the DNA signature. It shows up in David looks, in Jesus looks, and even in the looks of ancient
There is a Trinity Concept connecting Jesus to the Triune gods of Anu, which John appears to attempt to speak rather weakly, but which is there via
water and blood concepts linked to Anu.
When one works with the latter two concepts of Trinity, one finds and genetic history that links the concepts for 2 and 3 above, and even to 1, but
that appears not part of John's intentions because Jesus and the Essene considered the Babylon connections to Nimrod as god as false and corruption of
the truth. Via that same objection to Nimrod as god, John would never have assigned the Babylon Trinity to the memory for Jesus. Nor would Jesus
try to claim being god, but would claim a decendecy from the line of Anu.
These are big differences and a thin line separates the truth from the bogus attempts to make Nimrod god, or Jesus god, or even consider the Anu as
The Ignorant Pharisee and Sadducees could not figure out the differences, because they ignored the Anu information. Likewise, the vapid Christians
education is missing the same information.
If there was anything that a Jesus respecting Christian should know it is the original Triune god theme, and the line of decendency from that, which
sets up the correct trinity of water, blood, and spirit, but should not be inclusive of Father, Son, and Spirit because that is more Babylon's wording
for Nimrod, which the Essene and Jesus both consider profane.
If there was one concept that shows a Christian to be true or dishonest in his religion, it is can they recognize and speak accurately to these fine
separation of concepts that were the roots for those attempting to kill Jesus.
Only when any Christian correctly can process these subtile differences can he be called a true Christian and a follower of Jesus, and at that
crossing of the learning process none will term Jesus as god.
If any proclaimed Christian fails to comprehind these issues of trinity, then he fails to understand everything from Revelations back to the Story of
Genesis, and they cannot present the story in any correct light nor be considered knowledgable of religion.
edit on 24-7-2012 by MagnumOpus because: The real Triune Concepts