Something struck me about the Colorado killers picture., page 4


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 51 times


reply posted on 21-7-2012 @ 03:26 PM by Ilovecatbinlady
reply to post by claireaudient





I'm disturbed by their eyes which "scream" a profound mental instability.


You are so perceptive!!!

Maybe you could join a pre-crime unit and identify these people before they kill someone.


reply posted on 21-7-2012 @ 04:25 PM by FlySolo
reply to post by lonegurkha



I have to admit I thought of it too this morning. I downloaded those pics and blew them up in paint. Notice the odd shading on the corners of the mouth. Strange pixels. Maybe someone with more knowledge in this sort of thing can explain this.

The first one is of Holmes. Notice the edges on the pixels at the right. It doesn't really "blend in" with the rest of the shadows. Very jagged looking



And this is Lougheed


Look at the box like shadow at the right

Thoughts?


reply posted on 21-7-2012 @ 04:31 PM by Ilovecatbinlady
reply to post by FlySolo



Maybe their mouths were stretched from all that screaming when they were being mkultra-ed by the security services.

Months of mind wiping torture and screaming will alter the shape of the corners of your mouth from the constant stretching and tearing.


reply posted on 21-7-2012 @ 04:35 PM by FlySolo
reply to post by Ilovecatbinlady



No need to be cheeky. I'm just pointing out the odd pixelation.


reply posted on 21-7-2012 @ 04:35 PM by jiggerj
reply to post by lonegurkha



He reminds me of Zachary Levi from the TV show 'Chuck'.




reply posted on 21-7-2012 @ 05:08 PM by Vitruvian
Originally posted by mainidh
reply to
post by Vitruvian



And? You're saying they are the same person now?

And they're using the ONE photo that elicits the response you're showing them...


Sorry - I don't understand the question? I said nothing about anyone being the same person - my post points to a COMPARISON only..........if that's what you mean ?


reply posted on 21-7-2012 @ 05:25 PM by Ilovecatbinlady
reply to post by Vitruvian



So you now know what the Palestinians have to put up with...

It is an Aurora every day in the West Bank.


reply posted on 21-7-2012 @ 05:41 PM by SCGrits
reply to post by HangTheTraitors



media photos of the "shooter" were digitally altered to make them appear deranged.


I'm sorry, being a professionally trained journalist and media photographer (with the student loans and fancy pieces of paper that go with them) I will have to take issue with this statement as it applies to the US.

Yes, I will agree that this did apparently happen in Australia; apparently rules for journalism ethics there are way different; remember Rupert Murdoch, owner of Fox News and UK's The Sun fame, is an native Australian. Murdoch has absolutely no moral ethical code when it comes to journalism. I refuse to watch Fox News. And I sincerely mean no disrespect to you or any other Australian (other than Murdoch) by saying this.

That being said, AP (Associated Press) - the national wire service has actually fired photogs for digitally altering photos; they even went head to head with the DoD in 2008 a couple of times 'cause DoD has a penchant for altering file photos supplied by them to the media (gee go figure right-- When did DoD ever tell the truth about anything?!:@@

AP Suspends Use of U.S. Army Photos Over Digital Alteration
AP's director of photography Santiago Lyon said, "For us, there's a zero-tolerance policy of adding or subtracting actual content from an image."


AP drops freelance photographer who Photoshopped his shadow out of image
AP pictures must always tell the truth. We do not alter or digitally manipulate the content of a photograph in any way. The content of a photograph must not be altered in Photoshop or by any other means. No element should be digitally added to or subtracted from any photograph. The faces or identities of individuals must not be obscured by Photoshop or any other editing tool.


Our local paper the Charlotte Observer fired their photog for photoshopping the color on a pic of a sunset backlighting a firefighter in 2006; the Sacramento Bee just fired their photog for altering an image of a snowy egret and a frog. Another Photographer Fired for Manipulation: The Importance of Maintaining Honesty in Images
It is not just the fact that they are manipulating the images, but they are lying to the readers. ....What you’re seeing is my lens, my perspective of the world, or how best I can interpret it to you...... If I ever find myself questioning whether or not to alter an image, then perhaps the image wasn’t that great from the start.


If your gonna play the game here in the US you gotta know the rules, and here in the US Rule #1 is don't fu## with the photo. Rule #2 is basic Investigative Journalism 101 folks - always consider your source.

Now with that off my chest, yes I agree, but it's not so much the eyes as it's the smile; that "I've got a secret and I'm not gonna tell you" dastardly smile. Downright eerie.
edit on 21-7-2012 by SCGrits because: typo
edit on 21-7-2012 by SCGrits because: another typo

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Dumbing down reality
  Posted 5 days ago with 103 member flags
The 800 Pound Gorilla Everyone Ignores
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
The Illusion of Choice and Truth
  Posted 10 days ago with 52 member flags
A chronical of the BANKSTER WARS
  Posted 7 days ago with 42 member flags
Conspiracy Theory:The Lost Episode
  Posted 4 days ago with 39 member flags
666, NWO, Aliens and You!
  Posted 13 days ago with 36 member flags