Originally posted by plube
reply to post by Flatcoat
your correct there ...also IF you use that scenario..then there still would only be random spots where fire proofing was removed....not a complete
loss of fire proofing...which would even be more Damning to the OS as that should mean even more possibility of a asymmetrical collapse and not
Also just as all the OS go after character assassination do we call a spade a spade....guilt by association...so therefore all people on JREF can now
be considered to be what the allegations against the amazing Randi are...least i have the decency not to state what it is....but i can say...does this
make all the Jrefers wackjobs.
edit on 043131p://f23Sunday by plube because: (no reason given)
Yeah hey, and not only all that I think I can prove that towers 1 and 2 were full of ASBESTOS.
And of course we all know that asbestos goes up like a roman candle when you light it on fire...
You know I think a better argument can be made that it's a miracle there even was any fire considering the amount of asbestos and the fact that I have
proven that the right wing gash on the North Tower wasn't made by the wing of a Boeing 767, thus eliminating all the "jet fuel".
Oh yeah I'm still waiting btw for anyone to come in and prove to me there was jet fuel in the North Tower.
I want proof or you all can just quit talking about it. What's your best proof there was jet fuel in the North Tower?
And if you say something silly like: "The Naudet 'Fireman's Video' shows a 767 impacting the North Tower..." all I got to say is I got some very very
bad news for you and your "proof."
You're going to have to do better than that.
But that's not all, I been studying the fires in the North Tower and along the North Face there is a whole stretch line of fire the entire width of
the building... and I thought that was funny, all the fires in all the windows and who even put office furniture near all the windows all along the
entire width? When you look really really closely though you can see that the fire in the windows is all in the same place in every window - just like
someone planned it that way. Just like in HOLLYWOOD when they show a burning building by running hidden piping to spout fire.
Now why is this significant? I'll tell you.
I download 385 Fema Ground Zero pics when I was looking for evidence of computers and desks in the debris pile and I found one picture that seemed to
show connected piping all of a certain length near a fallen window section of the North Tower pile.
Here's what I think. There was no jet fuel. There was asbestos. There were empty floors. It was hard to get a fire going and it was much easier to
'fake it'. If you're going to blow the building down, on the empty floors themselves you wouldn't even need to conceal the fire causing piping. You
could just stick the pipes in the windows! Who was going to see from the ground with everything else going on?
No fireproofing was knocked off by any 767 impact. I have proven that. It was hard to start a fire, what sporadic fire existed was created.
edit on 22-7-2012 by NWOwned because: spelling