It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EyesWideShut
reply to post by SpearMint
He was calling his truck a missle...he doesn't actually have a "Missle Truck" At the end of the day we're going in circles, I've asked you to state to me in plain english why you feel firearms increase homicide, you can't. This should prove your arguement invalid.
In March 1982, 25 years ago, the small town of Kennesaw – responding to a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Ill. – unanimously passed an ordinance requiring each head of household to own and maintain a gun. Since then, despite dire predictions of “Wild West” showdowns and increased violence and accidents, not a single resident has been involved in a fatal shooting – as a victim, attacker or defender.
Prior to enactment of the law, Kennesaw had a population of just 5,242 but a crime rate significantly higher (4,332 per 100,000) than the national average (3,899 per 100,000). The latest statistics available – for the year 2005 – show the rate at 2,027 per 100,000. Meanwhile, the population has skyrocketed to 28,189
Link
According to you, this should be impossible.....please explain.
edit on 21-7-2012 by EyesWideShut because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SpearMint
But then you need to apply those same conditions to your examples, the world seems to be getting more violent and crime is generally on the rise. Maybe those increased rates would be the same or higher if gun laws didn't change, people don't just carry guns around on them and I can't really see people owning guns helping a lot of those statistics, carrying some other form of self defence like pepper spray, maybe a taser etc might, I don't know. Thank you for making a reasoned argument and considering what I had to say, no one else is.
Originally posted by bjax9er
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by bjax9er
oh i do get it.
i think i could kill quite a few people with this 80,000 pound missile (truck) i drive everyday.
should we ban all of those inanimate objects i listed?
please answer:
what do you call the cricket stick? i really want to know. seriously.
How many people have access to missile truck...? Please use realistic examples.
It's called a cricket bat. Not sure why you're talking about it like it's some weird sport Australia plays, I just want to point out that the rest of the world plays cricket and have international teams, baseball is just an American thing. I'm culturally aware enough to know what a baseball bat is called though, never watched or played it in my life. A bit off topic though.
well there are about 12 million 80,000 pound trucks in the u.s. i sleep in one every night.
i'am sure there are a few in aus. too
i refer to them as a missle, because of the damage they can do.
not a missile truck.
i was just curious as to what the cricket bat was called. no offense.
i actually want to play sometime.
but not without my gun, i'am a sore loser.
Coincidence With a decrease in the number of pirates, there has been an increase in global warming over the same period. Therefore, global warming is caused by a lack of pirates.
Originally posted by EyesWideShut
reply to post by SpearMint
Isolated numbers, I'm showing you an entire town where people are forced to be armed by law and they haven't had a homicide in 25 years. It doesn't matter what numbers we use or the size of the sample group, we will both find examples to prove our point. What I want to know is, do you honestly think things would be better if guns were banned from the law abiding populace?
I would like your opinion in "English" not "Numbers" , we've established that numbers can be played with. I'm trying to address the root cause of your arguement.edit on 21-7-2012 by EyesWideShut because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Darce
You also need to take a look at this SpearMint; en.wikipedia.org...
Coincidence With a decrease in the number of pirates, there has been an increase in global warming over the same period. Therefore, global warming is caused by a lack of pirates.
Okay? You can't just pick a couple statistics for entire nations and expect to prove anything. You know that gun laws are different from state to state in the US right? You cannot compare the US as one entity because there are far too many variables to even list.
Originally posted by Darce
reply to post by SpearMint
Broken record here.... you have to compare demographics as well, all the variables. You are over simplifying these choice stats to make claims which have no basis because... en.wikipedia.org...
In Mexico, where criminals are armed to the teeth with high-powered weapons smuggled from the United States, it may come as a surprise that the country has some of the most restrictive gun laws in the world.
Law-abiding Mexicans who want a gun to defend themselves have no good options. Either they fight government red tape to get a legal permit, or they buy one on the black market.
After an outbreak of violence, one embattled community in northern Mexico called Colonia LeBaron has begun to ask if it's time for the country to address its gun laws.
A farming town about 130 miles southwest of El Paso, Texas, in the border state of Chihuahua, Colonia LeBaron was founded by breakaway Mormons from the U.S. who wanted to practice polygamy. Today, most residents hold dual citizenship, speak English and retain close ties to the U.S. A few still practice plural marriage.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by SpearMint
Your statement has no basis in Logic. There are MANY ways to Kill a Person. Guns are just one of them. A person with a Steak Knife could easily kill another person...same thing with a big stick or a rock.
In the United States...it is a STATISTICAL FACT that communities that are well armed...such as the one I live in in Mass....as well as having Weapons Training Programs which I first went to at our local Police Station at the age of 11 years old....are OVERWHELMINGLY SAFER than communities which are not well armed or have Training Programs.
At 11 Years Old...just about every kid in my town goes with their Dad or Mom to this Police Sanctioned and run program which teaches WEAPON SAFETY. A Kid who understands the Danger that is inherent with a weapon as well as how to always treat a weapon as if it were loaded and taught every aspect of many different weapons as well as Knife and Hatchet or Axe Safety...will not become a STATISTIC!
Also...the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights which allows a U.S. Citizen...the RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS....was written as a way for the People of the Nation to be able to carry out a duty described in the Constitution as it say's VERY SPECIFICALLY that when the Government of the United States no longer represents the Will of the People or if it is not a Government of the People, By the People and For the People...then it is a U.S. Citizens DUTY to REMOVE such a Government and use the described system within the Constitution to Install via a certain process which eventually leads to New Elections.
The ability and Right to Bear Arms is a mechanism that helps insure this ability and DUTY of THE PEOPLE and the Forefathers and writers of the U.S. Constitution made sure that The Right to Bear Arms was a Right that is IMPOSSIBLE TO CHANGE without a U.S. Government being labeled a Government that no longer REPRESENTS THE PEOPLE.
All U.S. Citizens have this DUTY to protect the Constitution of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Split Infinity
Originally posted by Darce
reply to post by SpearMint
Yes it is, because you are trying to imply that more guns will cause more homicides.
Originally posted by SpearMint
I'll post these numbers again since they were ignored...
I'm going to use England & Wales as an example, but lots of other countries would work.
Overall Homicide rate per 100k people:
England & Wales - 1.45
USA - 4.55
So here we can see that homicide is much higher in the US, but this doesn't tell us much, so moving on.
Non-firearm Homicides per 100k people:
England & Wales - 1.33
USA - 1.58
Not that much difference, there's around the same amount of non-gun related murders in the USA as there are in England & Wales, let's move on.
Firearm Homicides per 100k people:
England & Wales - 0.12
USA - 2.97
And there we are, MUCH higher. Guns cause more homicides, what more proof do you need? 8% of homicides are gun related in England & Wales, 65% are gun related in the USA. Guns enable people to kill, and that's what they're used for. The proof is RIGHT THERE.
while tragedies often propel gun sales, increased gun sales seldom lead to more gun deaths.
However Lott has recently updated his findings with further evidence. According to the FBI, during the first year of the Obama administration the national murder rate declined by 7.4% along with other categories of crime which fell by significant percentages. During that same time national gun sales increased dramatically. According to Mr. Lott 450,000 more people bought guns in November 2008 than November 2007 which represents a 40% increase in sales, a trend which continued throughout 2009. The drop in the murder rate was the biggest one-year drop since 1999, another year when gun sales soared in the wake of increased calls for gun control as a result of the Columbine shooting.
hmmmm, less than 1% over an extended period.
Using publicly available media reports, the Violence Policy Center claims that from May 2007 through the end of 2009, concealed carry permit holders in the U.S. have killed at least 117 individuals, including 9 law enforcement officers (excluding cases where individuals were acquitted, but including pending cases). There were about 25,000 murders by firearm that period, meaning that concealed carry permit holders committed less than 1% of the murders by firearm. Furthermore, a large number of the victims were killed in extended suicides, most of which took place in the home of the shooter, where arms can be possessed without special permits. VPC also includes in its numbers several homicides using only long guns and several instances of accidental discharge.