Creator of I, Pet Goat II Revealed: Interview, page 1

Hello everyone! I know many of us have seen I, Pet Goat II and joined in on all the discussions surrounding it and I would just like to add an interview of the Director of Heliophat, Louis Lefebvre, that someone else pointed out for me. I hope I imbed it correctly (never done it before). I loved the video and diffidently took part in the couple of threads made about it. Anyway...Enjoy

This one?

Edit: btw when embedding a video you just have to copy and paste the part after the =. So for www.youtube.com... you only need YsPlPohPa1c.... Hope this helps for future reference.

reply to post by mee30

---

OH thank you so much! And I coulda' sworn that was one of the things I tried on my last edit

reply to post by awakendhybrid

---

No problem, I had the same problem when I was first figuring it out so not to worry. At least you know what to do for next time.

Btw I saw this when it was first uploaded, I'm subscribed to alex jones obviously. Whatever people say about alex he does indeed have some interesting guests on.

reply to post by Cassey222
more than the sum of its parts like most art, even he didn't fully understand his work.

reply to post by Cassey222

---

Interesting. I guess I got the opposite feel. I was relieved to see a more gentle soul who did truly care about his work and wasn't in it for the attention. The conversation was dominated and he was interrupted a lot, but I didn't blame him because it seemed very obvious to me that he is much more reserved and Alex considerably more outspoken.
Also, someone here (his username is Plube) had contacted him then posted that response on the two main I, Pet Goat II threads and in that response he said this all came to him visually and he tried to keep his own interpretations OUT of the making of the video.
Considering my personal and primary belief about I, Pet Goat II--that it came out of the pooled conscious resource that we're all connected to--I find it very reasonable that he wouldn't have an huge upper-hand in understanding it than the rest of us.
Thank you for your response though

reply to post by mee30

---

He is diffidently outspoken. I liked to see how enthusiastic he was about the video and Louis' interpretations, but I kinda wish he didn't interrupt him so much.
I enjoyed the interview for sure though.
Thanks again!

reply to post by Neopan100

---

I fixed it (with a little help)

Originally posted by usernamehere
reply to post by Cassey222
more than the sum of its parts like most art, even he didn't fully understand his work.

edit on 20-7-2012 by usernamehere because: spellinglingling

I agree. Beautifully said. I'm kinda glad that even he had to go on the same adventure any who delved into that video had to make. I'm also glad that a lot of us were on the same wavelength as him. I still have a hard time figuring out how so many people can read such a negative message of it though. It makes me sad because I know they would probably never consider another approach.

reply to post by awakendhybrid

---

Thanks Hybrid for posting.

I think I'm more confused now I've seen this interview.

Louis seems like a cool dude, but why did it sound like he was explaining someone elses creation. He said Jesus instead of Christ at one point, and he corrected himself, kind of embarrased.

Alex Jones is a tool, and always speaks over his guests and has to constantly assert his own view of reality. That aside, why did he not talk about the prophetic elements of this video, such as the 3 UFO's/Stealth Bombers destroying the mosque, or the Atomic cloud above the muslim mother.

Makes me suspicious - this is the work of the illuminati for sure. Just wait for this to start feeding in to the MSM, and the minds and consciousness of the masses. AJ even said in the interview - for the illuminati to generate power in their magic there must be prior knowledge/imprinting.

Please someone reply and give me a slap for being paranoid

Peace, Love and Light

* Ned

reply to post by nimbinned

---

Maybe to him, there ARE no prophetic elements. That is what WE read into it, but if you mentioned that to him he would likely agree to that possibility. He would agree because he wants to see everyone find their own interpretation, but I believe he would stake no personal claim on said prophesy.
I honestly think that he feels no personal ownership over this art of his--he knows it came from somewhere outside himself. And as I have stated a few times, he knows it came from all of us.

reply to post by plube

---

I'm glad you found the thread
When I first watched it seemed obvious to me that Louis was just a more reserved kind of person. I myself am the same way and could EASILY see myself blown-over by a personality such as Alex.
Today though, I am actually wondering if maybe Louis is a bit overwhelmed by the attention his 'labor of love' has generated and that is where some of that awkwardness comes into play.

reply to post by awakendhybrid

---

I am finding this interesting...everyone wants to interpret his video...but no one want to listen to the man himself and comment on his thoughts...I wonder why that is the case.

Are people so self centered that they are not willing to listen to the mans comments on his own piece of work....Do you find this strange ?

Who Controls Our Children? /The secret War Against America
  Posted 6 days ago with 38 member flags

Let\'s Ban Television!
  Posted 2 days ago with 20 member flags

FOX News Guides Al Qaeda Assassins To Seal Team Member\'s Doorstep
  Posted 18 days ago with 12 member flags

Are all these deaths a coincidence or is there more to the picture?
  Posted 2 days ago with 8 member flags

School. My son is Failing some subjects. Should I worry?
  Posted 7 days ago with 7 member flags

Elementary School dumps homework!
  Posted 4 days ago with 7 member flags

My Letter to Michael Gove
  Posted 15 days ago with 3 member flags

When the teacher is out of control.... there is a solution
  Posted 4 days ago with 2 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: