Nuclear fuel rods removed from Japan's Fukushima plant, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 31 times
Topic started on 20-7-2012 @ 02:07 PM by Maxmars

Nuclear fuel rods removed from Japan's Fukushima plant


www.newscientist.com
Operations commenced this week to remove nuclear fuel rods from a storage pool at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, some 16 months after the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl occurred at the Japanese site.

Plant operator TEPCO requested media outlets to refrain from filming the delicate and dangerous operations, but aerial images aired on TV and online showed cranes lifting two of the 1535 fuel units from the No 4 reactor building.
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 20-7-2012 @ 02:07 PM by Maxmars
[ALERT - HEADLINE DISCREPANCY]

If a reader were to base their opinion solely on the title of the article, I would expect a sense of relief...

However, they have not "removed the fuel rods" they have ONLY BEGUN to remove the fuel rods.

----------------------------------------------------------------

This tragedy is on the knife's edge; reportedly some 170,000 protested this move by TEPCO... who you may have noticed above "reminded" the press not to cover this operation (after the Japanese Parliament made it illegal to say anything "bad" about the situation at Fukushima.)

Here are some facts the reporters tells us:

...This process could take years.

(imagine that, years of no press coverage at the site of the most significant nuclear disaster of our time.)

...the biggest concern remains the sheer volume of fuel in the storage pools, which, if exposed to the air, would release vast amounts of radiation.

The word "vast" doesn't really convey an adequate sense of what we are talking about here.... but he expands...

"The amount of caesium-137 in the fuel in the pools is equivalent to 5000 times the amount that was spread by the Hiroshima atomic bomb," says Koide. "The government has said that the amount of radioactivity released by the three affected reactors following [last year's disaster] was 168 times that of Hiroshima, so it is clear that we would be looking at a considerably worse outcome should the [reactor number 4] structure be compromised."


When the Japanese government used these estimates (worst-case scenario) they determined that 35 million people would need to be evacuated from Tokyo.

The operation begins by removing the 204 unexpended fuel rods remaining...

TEPCO, which declined to comment on the latest operations due to their "sensitive" nature, estimates that such operations will commence in December 2013, though Koide believes that is ambitious. "It's a process that carries with it an immense amount of danger," he says.


Just keeping us updated... thought you might like to know.

www.newscientist.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
edit on 20-7-2012 by Maxmars because: (no reason given)
edit on 20-7-2012 by Maxmars because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 20-7-2012 @ 04:16 PM by Maxmars
reply to post by Unity_99



I echo your questions. Seriously.

I would have thought that a prime function of organization like the UN would have been responding to these kinds of events, or at least coordinating a global response to situations of this magnitude.

But then... that would interfere with the sovereignty of the mighty transnational corporation... which apparently supersedes that of nations (just look at the BP oil spill... it was "hands off" from the get-go.)


reply posted on 20-7-2012 @ 04:18 PM by Unity_99
reply to post by Maxmars



It is the most insane thing going, that we are living in this situation and electing these kind of nimrods, and corrupt beings into office, and that so many people are NLP'd to the level that basic, common sense logic doesnt phase them, they simply don't get it.

Try talking about this issue with people and see how far you get. Free Will?

That brings up something to me, free will? Do we have it? When its so basic and common sense yet so bizarre,does this reflect humanity being free will agents? Does this mean they are culpable in any way, if they're not, according to universal or spirtual culpability?

I mean this brings a host of deeper thoughts to me.
edit on 20-7-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 20-7-2012 @ 08:19 PM by Maxmars
reply to post by Pazuzu67



Considering there are only a handful (5 or 6 maybe) actual "owners" of media in the world, it's not that hard to get a "policy" like that to work... theoretically.

I believe the politicians and elites have long had the capacity to more or less "control" the media. And they don;t want panic and anxiety to rule the day... especially after an earthquake and a tsunami. So I understand the rationale and ostensible justification behind the action

But that the cumulative effect of the act is to shield TEPCO from PR damage... especially when they are so well-placed to blame for the idiocy of accepting the risk of locating their reactor complex where they did doesn't elude me. The are those for whom nations will surrender justice. Otherwise it might lead to questions about why they DID park them there. Whose land was that? Did they get rich off the deal? etc. etc.

And how about the Energy Cartel... they've been foisting this operational model as "safe" when it clearly didn't respond well to the very thing they assured it could reasonably withstand.... go figure. They lobbied political appointees into regulatory bodies around the world to to advise government based on their "expertise."

No, I suspect for that scenario, it's best we not rouse the rabble.


reply posted on 20-7-2012 @ 08:50 PM by Pazuzu67
reply to post by Maxmars



All great points.

I'm truly at a loss for words. This is one of those types of disasters that is too horrific to even fathom completely. I think people (including myself) choose to block it out and stay in a state of denial. Every time I think it about it, it makes me shudder.

The lack of a true and effective plan in case of a disaster really bothers me. The dilapidated condition of other existing nuclear power plants in dangerous locations makes it seems inevitable that this type of accident will happen again.


reply posted on 20-7-2012 @ 09:11 PM by Maxmars
Originally posted by Pazuzu67
reply to
post by Maxmars



......The dilapidated condition of other existing nuclear power plants in dangerous locations makes it seems inevitable that this type of accident will happen again.



I wish I could honestly say that was wrong.... but I think that actuarial tables that drive "profit" for these ... people.... counts the human condition as an externality... and thus, is of no meaningful consequence.
edit on 20-7-2012 by Maxmars because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags