If a reader were to base their opinion solely on the title of the article, I would expect a sense of relief...
However, they have not "removed the fuel rods" they have ONLY BEGUN to remove the fuel rods.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This tragedy is on the knife's edge; reportedly some 170,000 protested this move by TEPCO... who you may have noticed above "reminded" the press not to cover this operation (after the Japanese Parliament made it illegal to say anything "bad" about the situation at Fukushima.)
Here are some facts the reporters tells us:
...This process could take years.
(imagine that, years of no press coverage at the site of the most significant nuclear disaster of our time.)
...the biggest concern remains the sheer volume of fuel in the storage pools, which, if exposed to the air, would release vast amounts of radiation.
The word "vast" doesn't really convey an adequate sense of what we are talking about here.... but he expands...
"The amount of caesium-137 in the fuel in the pools is equivalent to 5000 times the amount that was spread by the Hiroshima atomic bomb," says Koide. "The government has said that the amount of radioactivity released by the three affected reactors following [last year's disaster] was 168 times that of Hiroshima, so it is clear that we would be looking at a considerably worse outcome should the [reactor number 4] structure be compromised."
When the Japanese government used these estimates (worst-case scenario) they determined that 35 million people would need to be evacuated from Tokyo.
The operation begins by removing the 204 unexpended fuel rods remaining...
TEPCO, which declined to comment on the latest operations due to their "sensitive" nature, estimates that such operations will commence in December 2013, though Koide believes that is ambitious. "It's a process that carries with it an immense amount of danger," he says.
Just keeping us updated... thought you might like to know.
www.newscientist.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
edit on 20-7-2012 by Maxmars because: (no reason given)
edit on 20-7-2012 by Maxmars because: (no reason given)


