It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by HolographicPrincipal
this appeared today via Infowars that sheds some light on Holmes and his family:
Originally posted by IamMe14
Originally posted by senselessness
I do have a theory on the last question though. IF he was in fact trying to be the Joker, in TDK the Joker purposely allowed himself to get caught and ended up having a plan to break out. Perhaps James/Joker thinks he has some master plan of escape up his sleeve
Thats a interesting theory, we will have to see if he attempts to escape or anything like thatedit on 25-7-2012 by jd0Fengland because: (no reason given)
Holmes was no stranger to sex web sites ... and sources tell us he also frequented a message board where potential johns posted reviews for hookers in the Colorado area. We found the message board ... and discovered several posts written under James' supposed screen name ... in which he details multiple sexual encounters with different prostitutes. TMZ spoke to three of the women Holmes supposedly reviewed. Hooker #1 told us she meets with lots of men and couldn't confirm she ever did business with James. Hooker #2 said Holmes "looked very familiar" but couldn't say for certain if he was a client. But Hooker #3 was POSITIVE she had met up with Holmes ... not once, but twice ... as recently as August 2011. The woman, who goes by the name "Tiffany" -- tells TMZ ... "I had no issues with him … he was really nice.”
"Out of respect for the victims and families in Aurora, Colorado DC Entertainment has made the decision to postpone the release of BATMAN INCORPORATED #3 for one month because the comic contains content that may be perceived as insensitive in light of recent events."
If they are trying to provoke something who knows maybe he will walk free from it, just to rile up the locals, I'm sure if he did they would have a full on riot on there hands
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by violet
Alot in my opinion! No to mention, he gave contrary evidence to the witnesses who said the shooter yelled alot.
It's so transparent and obvious what is going on, and many are getting it, and with all the police shooting people, there was a riot in Dallas, its so transparent.
Are they really going for gun control?
Or are they trying to incite something, really make make people mad?edit on 25-7-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)