Obama's Kenyan birth records discovered in British National Archives, page 4


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 64 times


reply posted on 20-7-2012 @ 01:45 PM by xuenchen
Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
I found BHO Sr. INS application dated 8/31/61. Just as the blog reports he scratched out something and signed Ann S. Dunham in the spouse box. There is no mention of any children.










Strange indeed.

Another odd thing too.

Ann S. Dunham ????

Should be S. Ann Dunham ?

Or how about "S. Ann Obama" ?????

married or not ?

Also Obama "Sr." didn't write in his passport number ?

And left list of children blank. you would think "Sr." would have been proud as hell.

Obama "Sr."'s bio says he had sons in "prior" marriages.

Why no other "sons" named after him ????

Obama Sr. must have been a polygamist ??

I wonder if Obama "Sr." ever met Frank Marshall Davis ?


reply posted on 20-7-2012 @ 01:55 PM by Alternative4u
reply to post by NeoVain


I am certain if you like it or not you in the USA have been took for a ride, why dare you not just admit your mistake, you have elected a Muslim leader, be proud of it, you do not want to be the same as you have always been do you? now get your copy of the Koran and start to learn it and follow your leader like good boys and girls, or learn by your mistakes and do not give him another term.



reply posted on 20-7-2012 @ 02:07 PM by longlostbrother
BREAKING NEWS!!

JOHN F KENNEDY NOT ASSASSINATED!!!

Researchers have discovered that, unlike what you've learned and heard, John F Kennedy was not assassinated.

www.facebook.com...

Unfortunately his profile is set to private (despite a friend request) and so we may never know the whole truth.

This is ABSOLUTE PROOF though that Kennedy is STILL ALIVE.


reply posted on 20-7-2012 @ 02:08 PM by longlostbrother
reply to post by ModernAcademia



being able to replicate the exact same effect, by simply scanning a document, is proof enough, for anyone sane.


reply posted on 20-7-2012 @ 02:10 PM by HolgerTheDane2
Originally posted by NeoVain
***snip***
Oh and regarding the layers issue, here is something to get you started(notice the date)..





Doesn't anyone question the difference between an expert who talks about the product of a process when a document is scanned and the ramblings of a snotty nosed kid who uses a completely different program to point out som elements in the original pdf. And doing this by manipulating the elements and pdf in a way that the original scanning software doesn't and hasn't?

An imperical test would be about trying to recreate the alleged process - not reverse ingeneering with different software.

You don't prove anything by running OCR on a pdf that has artifacts as a result of an OCR proces. Except that you aren't an expert.

Of course one can change none to wife if it has been deemed by the orinal scanning software that this particular bit is in fact text. Proves nothing except that the OCR proces worked with that text.

KIDS!


reply posted on 20-7-2012 @ 02:37 PM by Kharron
reply to post by NeoVain



Grasping at straws now guys.

Quoting blogs on ATS isn't really gonna persuade anyone, although in this new age ATS it seems it will get you lots of stars.

The decline of what used to be great forums.


reply posted on 20-7-2012 @ 03:29 PM by LucidDreamer85
reply to post by NeoVain



So...She gets impregnated by a Kenyan and another Kenyan pretends to be that other Kenyan so he can use the women and kid to gain access to staying in the US..

Others are involved most likely....


reply posted on 20-7-2012 @ 03:30 PM by longlostbrother
reply to post by LucidDreamer85



That's not what is says... and it's not any kind of evidence of anything...


reply posted on 20-7-2012 @ 03:54 PM by flashtrum
Originally posted by GeisterFahrer
reply to
post by rival



Thank you. My reaction was the same. There was an assumption that because Hillary visited the archives, that she was the one who put the "outdated" privileged access to Obama's alleged birth certificate.

If it is outdated, why can't anyone access them?

Also, why would she do that to someone she was running against?
edit on 20-7-2012 by GeisterFahrer because: (no reason given)


I can put forth a theory on that one. If you go back to that election the fight between Obama and Clinton was extremely brutal. Maybe worse than what we are seeing between Obama and Romney. I don't think you try to take someone down like that and decide you have to have that person as part of your inner circle. So, perhaps she did find evidence, decided that maybe it was enough to convince Barry to listen to her proposal, but maybe not enough or in not enough time to actually take him down.

So maybe it went something like "Barry, this is Hillary. I know something most people don't. I think you know what I am talking about. I want a commitment to be Secretary of State or else this goes to the New York Times and the Washington Post in the morning? What? I got the job? Ok, thanks. See you at the White House!!"


reply posted on 20-7-2012 @ 03:56 PM by zonetripper2065
reply to post by WormwoodSquirm



So if I don't like Obama I'm supporting Romney?

Romney and Obama both suck . Personally I feel anyone who votes for either is as deluded/misinformed as they are..
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



A Really Sad Picture That I Saw Today, Left Me Speechless
  Posted 12 days ago with 148 member flags
Fact Check: First Lady\'s False Fairy Tale of Struggle
  Posted 6 days ago with 81 member flags
Coal miners say they were forced to attend Romney event and donate
  Posted 14 days ago with 71 member flags
Stephen King\'s Message
  Posted 10 days ago with 71 member flags
Paul Ryan Exposes Elite Agenda, "Shut Up" Says Banker
  Posted 10 days ago with 40 member flags