It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

OMG ! He rewarded his campaign donors ?

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 01:09 AM
link   
Where is the truth and honesty in this campaign ?
How can anyone campaigning, who rewards their biggest campaign donors with appointments or money , be trusted ?
This is totally beyond belief. Are we all really just sheeple ? These questions can not go unanswered !




a review of the Romney's own 2006 appointees to Massachusetts posts — conducted by cross-referencing press releases with a Romney donor database — show Romney himself has a history of rewarding donors with political postions. Indeed, all but one of Romney's 2006 press releases for appointments are for Romney donors, a total of 15 out of 17 appointees.



www.buzzfeed.com...

Good night kiddies.


We don't need no stinking tax returns !

edit on 20-7-2012 by OLD HIPPY DUDE because: (no reason given)

edit on 20-7-2012 by Gemwolf because: Removed all caps title



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 01:23 AM
link   
Hmmm...I wonder who'll benefit if Mitt wins in November?


Goldman Sachs $593,080
JPMorgan Chase & Co $467,089
Bank of America $425,100
Morgan Stanley $399,850
Credit Suisse Group $390,360
Citigroup Inc $312,800
Kirkland & Ellis $264,302
Wells Fargo $237,550
Barclays $234,650
PricewaterhouseCoopers $227,250
Deloitte LLP $222,250
HIG Capital $216,995
UBS AG $207,750
Blackstone Group $198,800
Bain Capital $156,500
Elliott Management $146,275
Marriott International $137,827
General Electric $135,450
Bain & Co $130,550
EMC Corp $129,450



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 01:26 AM
link   
reply to post by OLD HIPPY DUDE
 

You certainly fooled me. I thought, until I got down to your quote, that you were talking about Obama.

So let's see, Romney gives jobs to people who don't oppose him. That makes sense.

Many people who support Romney donate to his campaign. Obvious.

People who have proven themselves in the private sector tend to have lots of money and impressive credentials. OK

People who have lots of money are able to donate more. Sure

So you're worried? Why? Isn't that standard policy for all politicians?



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 01:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by maddog99
Hmmm...I wonder who'll benefit if Mitt wins in November?


Goldman Sachs $593,080
JPMorgan Chase & Co $467,089
Bank of America $425,100
Morgan Stanley $399,850
Credit Suisse Group $390,360
Citigroup Inc $312,800
Kirkland & Ellis $264,302
Wells Fargo $237,550
Barclays $234,650
PricewaterhouseCoopers $227,250
Deloitte LLP $222,250
HIG Capital $216,995
UBS AG $207,750
Blackstone Group $198,800
Bain Capital $156,500
Elliott Management $146,275
Marriott International $137,827
General Electric $135,450
Bain & Co $130,550
EMC Corp $129,450




All of the above. That's why I say our country is up for the highest bidder, every one of these will get their share.
It's hopeless no matter who wins the election. Obama will continue to shred the Constitution, Romney would auction it off. Or outsource for a re write.



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 01:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by maddog99
Hmmm...I wonder who'll benefit if Mitt wins in November?


Goldman Sachs $593,080
JPMorgan Chase & Co $467,089
Bank of America $425,100
Morgan Stanley $399,850
Credit Suisse Group $390,360
Citigroup Inc $312,800
Kirkland & Ellis $264,302
Wells Fargo $237,550
Barclays $234,650
PricewaterhouseCoopers $227,250
Deloitte LLP $222,250
HIG Capital $216,995
UBS AG $207,750
Blackstone Group $198,800
Bain Capital $156,500
Elliott Management $146,275
Marriott International $137,827
General Electric $135,450
Bain & Co $130,550
EMC Corp $129,450



All these successful corporations didn't become successful on their own, but a lot of people are better off as a result.


edit on 20-7-2012 by Alxandro because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 01:39 AM
link   
An interesting site: www.opensecrets.org... They report that so far in this campaign Obama has raised $255 million and Romney has raised $121 million. Are you really concerned about candidates and money?



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 02:41 AM
link   



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 03:16 AM
link   
Are we being serious?


Later, in March, Romney appointed Paul F. Kelly to the Massachusetts Maritime Academy Board of Trustees. Kelley had donated $50 to Romney's gubernatorial committee.


You really think these people got their positions because they donated $50 to a millionaire's campaign who gets bankrolled by...banks?

The reasons why these people got their positions was not because of their donations. Or maybe I'm missing some info or missed the joke. In which case, sorry.

edit on 20-7-2012 by TheLegend because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 09:17 AM
link   
OMG this happens all the time
Even Obama does this except since he's the POTUS he's given them WAYYY MORE powerful roles within Govt.

That's the entire point of over-regulation, they put lobbyists as heads of regulatory bodies
Then that mega-corp becomes a monopoly and people get screwed

Obama does this all the time



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 09:51 AM
link   
What ? Do some of you work for Fox News , puttin your own spin on my post ?
I just thought it was funny. Yes, almost all of them do it, and it doesn't make it right.
Many of you are going to vote for the lesser of two evils,so I'm just providing more info.

Ron Paul or bust !



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 09:54 AM
link   
ah yes ... typical poltiician. If he were to win, he'd fit in nicely with all the other stink'n POTUS' we have had. He and Obama can exchange notes on rewarding campaign donors and on poltiical payoffs. Pretty SUCKY!



new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join