posted on Jul, 23 2012 @ 08:58 PM
Originally posted by 911files
Originally posted by ThePostExaminerYou're talking about irrelevant clutter and traffic being filtered which was actually
explained in the film itself...
Jesus Christ Farmer...hahaha
No it was not or I would not be asking. There is no "irrelevant clutter and traffic", unless you want only to show people what you want them to see.
So I must have missed it in the video. What filters did they apply and what are the identification of the two tracks that "merged"? That is a very
easy query with the RS3 software. Should not be a problem for you to provide that.
And no, I won't go away. You posted the video which makes an assertion. I'm only focusing on one. Now provide the data to back up the assertion
because the video does not provide it. And no, it is not acceptable to display a video representation of something without making it very clear how
the original data was "tampered" with to produce it. Except of course in cartoons.
edit on 23-7-2012 by 911files because: (no reason
You want me
to do your bidding again after you wasted 11 pages of nonsense on something that's actually explained in the video? Other aircraft
tracks merged with 9/11 Aircraft tracks according to the RADES data. This is a fact based on the data. Nothing was "tampered" with to show such
merging as you initially claimed.
The screen captures in the film are not a "cartoon", they are directly recorded from the RADES RS3 software, isolating the relevant tracks, and
colours changed for easier reference for a wider audience.
I'm not going to explain this again. If you have a specific point to make, cut the crap and make it.
And The History Channel must have thought highly enough of Rob's "cartoons" to include one of them in their program "America's Book Of
Did you see it?