The first immortal man?, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 19 times


reply posted on 19-7-2012 @ 01:18 PM by LiberalSceptic
reply to post by Chi-and-Me



I think the soul will "hang around" and transform into whatever option it gets to reside.
Perhaps it is all up to the will of the soul itself.


reply posted on 19-7-2012 @ 01:20 PM by davidchin
I agree with previous posts about not knowing how memories are stored and even how separate our consciousnesses are from our bodies.

For those who don't believe in life after death, then this would likely be a waste of time anyways.

For those who believe that there is a separate "self" that defines each of us, then we need to determine whether all of that even exists encoded within the matrix/network of the brain. I recall reading about a suggestion that memories might be kept in the glial or supporting cells between the neurons in the brain, or something like that.

But there is the other question of how to truly determine that someone who says that they have all the memories of a person and claims to be that person and exhibits all the mannerisms associated with that person is, in fact, really that person.

I think it may be like the scene in the Avatar movie where the main character used the tree that everyone linked into to transfer himself from his human body into his native blue body. The movie showed his first-person point of view with him closing his eyes being in his old body while it is dying and he sees things getting blurry, then opening his eyes and finding himself inside his new body that can live on the planet without special equipment. That would probably be what someone would experience while being transferred to a machine that could copy and perform all of their brain functions. But how would such a person be able to prove to everyone else that they are really still themselves but in a new "body"? Still, for those of us who would be trying to determine if the machine functioning with all of the characteristics of the person is really that person, or just a machine mimicking that person, we would not be able to say that is really the same person for certain. Or would it be merely like a clone of the person as a distinct entity who has all the original person's memories, but who is a separate person? Think of identical twins who, while being genetic copies of each other, are still distinct individuals who have their own separate identities and do not share each other's consciousness.

That would be a difficult puzzle, trying to determine if a person really transferred to the new brain/body, or if it is just a new entity with memories of the prior person.


reply posted on 19-7-2012 @ 01:24 PM by Taupin Desciple
reply to post by elevenaugust



A curious fellow indeed.

You know, my brother calls me bulletproof. I see it as we live forever by what people remember us by. If you're a forgettable type of person, you're not going to live forever.

You want to live forever? Quit trying to "upload" your brain into a computer and start "downloading" your actions in a way that affects people in a positive and lasting fashion. Works for me. People from when I was a teenager, hell even their mothers, remember me when I barely remember them. Why? Beats the hell out of me. Guess I'm a nice guy who left an impression.

I guess too that's what makes me bulletproof. Nice guys finish last because they're builtto last.

And Hayworth? Well, I hope it all works out for him.

ETA: ( It HAS been done BTW )

youtu.be...





edit on 19-7-2012 by Taupin Desciple because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 19-7-2012 @ 01:25 PM by yuppa
reply to post by boncho


Here is a question for you. What if humans could remove their brains still alive but in a special casing housing them? Then transfer it over to a synthetic body packed with neuron that would connect to the Brain stem in the protective casing? Nanobots would have to wire the brain up to the synthetic body but afterwards the person is synched with the new body. Now would that person still be Themselves or different?

Yes I love Ghost In the shell. Its got some interesting ideas.


reply posted on 19-7-2012 @ 01:26 PM by iforget
reply to post by getreadyalready



Ouch what I mean is what fun life without the good and the bad that comes with it


reply posted on 19-7-2012 @ 01:27 PM by davidchin
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
reply to
post by boncho



Essentially, you could make 1 or 100 copies of the same thing. None of which would be "you".

Debatable. The medium on which consciousness is stored is irrelevant if the consciousness can operate as normal. Just because the consciousness no longer exists and operates inside the biological human shell it was originally operating in, doesn't mean it's not the same consciousness. True, you could make more than one copy, but each of them would whole heartedly believe they were the original. It could be said all of them are "you"... what ever "you" really means.


As noted, all of these copies would believe themselves to be "you", but I suspect that none are actually "you", with the actual experience of going to "sleep" then awakening in the new body. The original "you" ceases to exist in this reality and would potentially continue elsewhere, and none of the new "you"s would be a continuation of your own consciousness. And none of the new "you"s would share their consiousnesses. It would be more like identical twins who happen to have inherited the same memories.
edit on 19-7-2012 by davidchin because: typos fixed




reply posted on 19-7-2012 @ 01:32 PM by davidchin
reply to post by yuppa



Yes, Ghost in the Shell had some great concepts, but even there, the brain (and it seems the spinal cord as well) was kept alive and transferred to the newer bodies.


reply posted on 19-7-2012 @ 01:34 PM by Chi-and-Me
reply to post by LiberalSceptic



That may be possible. But I would think only a "spiritual" person or at least a "soul concious" person could make that transition. I assume Hayworth believes there is nothing after death. But I've been wrong once or twice before.


reply posted on 19-7-2012 @ 01:36 PM by LiberalSceptic
reply to post by Chi-and-Me



I agree with you. For it to work, the soul probably has to be aware of its own potential.


reply posted on 19-7-2012 @ 01:37 PM by ChaoticOrder
reply to post by davidchin



I suspect that none are actually "you", with the actual experience of going to "sleep" then awakening in the new body.
Actually, if the brain and memories were copied and uploaded moments before or after they died, they will probably have a memory of dying in their physical body, and then a blank, until they wake up in their new computerised shell. It would seem to them like they fell asleep or passed out, and then woke up some where completely different. It would most likely be extremely confusing and traumatising for the initial period of entry into the computer shell.


reply posted on 19-7-2012 @ 01:40 PM by ChaoticOrder
Originally posted by davidchin
reply to
post by yuppa



Yes, Ghost in the Shell had some great concepts, but even there, the brain (and it seems the spinal cord as well) was kept alive and transferred to the newer bodies.

The main female character was completely artificial and even capable of transmitting her consciousness through the internet and into other mechanical bodies.


reply posted on 19-7-2012 @ 02:06 PM by michaelbrux
reply to post by DerepentLEstranger



i assume that he's completely defined the 'conscious self' and determined a way to upload this into a computer 'file'.

after having done this...then what?

does he enjoy emotional satisfaction like sex or love, even...what happens if, when, he gets horny or lonely?

does he go to a porn site...is he interacting with these lifeless videos or pictures as if they are real?

what happens if he gets hungry? can he simulate the event of eating something or does he have to remind himself that food is not real?

what happens when he wants to take a walk or is he trapped where his surroundings never change?

i think...that he would continue to desire all of the things a human animal desires, but wouldn't be able to satisfy any of them.

eventually, perhaps, he would learn to do without them, but by that time, he'd be nothing more than a machine and lacking anyway to enjoy any of the things that make us human.





edit on 19-7-2012 by michaelbrux because: (no reason given)
edit on 19-7-2012 by michaelbrux because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Pokemon discovered in Venezuela
  Posted 14 days ago with 47 member flags
89-Year-Old Man Develops Bladeless Bird-Friendly Wind Turbine
  Posted 11 days ago with 45 member flags
Amazing snowflake images that you have never seen before.
  Posted 14 days ago with 44 member flags
Energy Solutions THEY don\'t want you to know about
  Posted 14 days ago with 35 member flags
Does this video show a working self propelled magnetic engine?
  Posted 7 days ago with 31 member flags
Viruses: alive or not?
  Posted 11 days ago with 30 member flags
NASA reveals secrets it has hidden on the Curiosity rover.
  Posted 17 days ago with 29 member flags