posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 07:00 PM
reply to post by theGreatunhosed
Dear theGreatunhosed: I love your name. Wish I had thought of it. Very nice for a first thread. I gave you a star & flag the other day but was
delayed in posting.
It's a great point: weather modification for the reason of getting more business for corporations. From what I understand, there is a set amount of
water in the hydrological cycle of our planet. Rain in one place, therefore, means no rain someplace else. Floods (goofs in weather modification)
which mean outlandish rainfall in short amounts of time also, therefore, mean no rain in the future. Everything in nature takes time. Getting the
atmosphere to dump prematurely is, imo, rash.
To me, none of this falderal really benefits, in any way, the great unwashed. If a portion of the unwashed receive rain and that receipt denies rain
to another unwashed portion, I'm thinking that just means aid and food packages to famine areas due to drought. The unwashed in one geographical area
will reap benefits (sans floods!) but, by conscience, will then feel compelled to spend those benefits to help those thereby deprived...this is
As far as corporations having the right to decree who receives rain and who doesn't - I'm against it.
edit on 20-7-2012 by luxordelphi because: