It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by celticdog
I always read the OP and then the comments before I make a comment or if I really want to make comment.I caught on to him and he called me out and said I was lying on the thread that went sideways.It was all about promoting Jehovah's Witnesses. We are not perfect and we see trigger words and that sets people off before looking at the whole picture or what actually is said.People are too quick off the mark.I try to take it slow and see what the point that is made then read the comments.Sometimes someone has commented and it has made me go back and re-read the OP.Noregretsever made a good point,good eye.
Recently the writer of the current thread received a comment that affirms the following (on another thread of mine):
First of all the Jehovah's Witnesses did not speak out against the atrocities against the Jews because there were no [sic]atrocites.Thats[sic] a fact whether you like it or not.
Originally posted by NoRegretsEver
Here is the real surprise.... now hold on to your hats.....
No one actually debated his "actual" claims!!
Yes there were JW's there, but the story, where he got it from, and its inaccuracy was never called into question!
Some caught on but were ignored. He is a JW, and he was promoting JW's stance, by discussing something as atrocious as their deaths, without anyone asking him why, or challenging his references, not even a little.
This was a JW production/advertisement/solicitation if I have ever seen one.
Originally posted by azbowhunter
Your thread is going to accomplish nothing. Sad but true.
Don't get me wrong, I agree with you 100%, but you will have better luck trying to discipline a kid with MASSIVE ADHD than getting people to act their age here. (Or, maybe they ARE acting their age and this place is nothing more than an online daycare.)