Meh. Private organization, so if anyone does not like it they should not join or support them. The freedom of association goes both ways.

Originally posted by knoledgeispower
Do your kids go to school? Do they play sports or other extra ciricular activity? Do they go to church? Guess what!?! You could be potentially putting them in the care of a heterosexual pedophile.

How ignorant to think that homosexuality instantly means that you are a pedophile. There are as many heterosexual pedophiles out there as there are homosexual pedophiles. Pedophiles, of any sexual orientation, chose jobs where they will be around little kids.

Just to be clear on this.

Pedophile is its own Orientation - - it is neither heterosexual or homosexual.

The attraction is children. Often by availability not gender. Pedophiles put themselves in roles that allows them access to children. When the Catholic church let girls be "choirboys" - - - there was an increase in molestation of girls. Prior to that only boys were accessible.

If a Pedophile targets a same gender child - - - it is referred to as a homosexual ACT. But the orientation is still Pedophile. If a Pedophile targets an opposite gender child - - it is referred to as a heterosexual ACT. The sexual orientation is still Pedophile.

Neither a homosexual or a heterosexual is a Pedophile.

So the homosexuals are claiming that nobody has the right to refuse them access and they can go anywhere they want to and have to be accepted.

Yet they don't have to accept anybody they don't want to accept.

What hypocrites.

As usual the people who claim to be open minded are actually not.

Here's my issue with this.

We know from brain scans that gay males have more female-like brains. The reverse is true for gay females.

We don't normally allow woman to supervise boys when it's boy things they're doing, especially when the relationship is intimate like in the example of a boy scout troop. For example, most (or all) basketball coaches for males are male themselves. This is probably not just by accident!!

What this means is that gay males should not lead boys in similar conditions. For example, a gay man should not coach a male basketball team. This is consistent with that example.

How do you minimize the chances that the scout leader will molest your son?

First of all, to be safe, you don't want a scout leader that has any attraction to males (of any sort). If the scout leader -does- have an attraction then you want to make sure it's not pedophilic.

These're invented numbers to express an idea:
a) Chance that a male or female scout leader is pedophile: 3%
b) Chance that a male or female scout leader is gay: 9%

What this means is that if you outright pick a male to be the boy scout leader then you're 88% sure to be safe since it's 88% likely that he will not be gay or a pedophile.

Some more invented numbers to express an idea:
a) Chance that a gay male scout leader will molest a boy: 3%
b) Chance that a gay female scout leader will molest a boy: 0%
(this assumes that they're not pedophilic)
(... in (a) I added 3% to denote sexual curiosity even though it's not the result of pedophilia)

What this means is that if a gay boy scout leader is female, she's less likely to molest any of the boys precisely because there's no sexual curiosity since she's attracted to females.

These (invented) numbers say that a heterosexual female scout leader would have a 3% chance of molesting a boy. Note that she's -not- pedophilic. This 3% is not based on fact, just fear. It's based on the assumption that non-pedophilic people can still molest underage persons if they're attracted to their sex. This is the case if the relationship is close, like in the case of boy scout troops. The idea is that they become sexually curious and/or confused by the close relationship with them.

Originally posted by EvilSadamClone

Yet they don't have to accept anybody they don't want to accept.

What hypocrites.

As usual the people who claim to be open minded are actually not.

You shouldn't blanket the LGBTQ

I've read your exact sentiments on LGBTQ blogs - - - chastising their own members.

Just saying.

Originally posted by jonnywhite

What this means is that gay males should not lead boys when they're doing boy things. For example, a gay man should not coach a male basketball team. This is consistent with what I'm saying.

Yes - - by all means - - let's continue promoting the Neanderthal stereotype male.

There are feminine hetero men and macho homosexual men.

Most gays you probably wouldn't know they were gay even if you met them.

Haven't scouts evolved to interests in computers/science/gaming - etc?

My grandson is straight - - - never had any interest in sports. He likes to read.

Funny (not) that one of the things Reparative Therapy requires is that gay men play sports. If you're tall they force you to play basketball.

Originally posted by Christian Voice
There is a notable homosexual group, consisting of thousands of members, known as the North American Man and Boy Love Association ( NAMBLA). This is a child molesting homosexual group whose cry is "SEX BEFORE 8 BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE." This group can be seen marching in most major homosexual parades across the United States.

Pics or it didn't happen.

Lie bolded by me.

I have been to plenty gay pride parades and have NEVER seen NAMBLA having a contingency there. They would get boo'ed and probably beaten up by the more militant gays.