Syrian conflict: The beginning of the end?

Al jazeera Accidentally Admits it, Syrian Mujahideen

www.aljazeera.com

"This is my urgent message to all Mujahideen from all brigades to join their brothers the Mujahideen of Damascus who are defending the revolution. Those willing to join have to go ... through safe routes to Damascus. It is the moment of truth. It is the Damascus fight for salvation. It is either life, dignity and freedom or martyrdom and paradise."

Commander of Al-Emary Brigades, Captian Quais Quatana's statement for all Syrian Mujahideen

(visit the link for the full news article)

Grab a Screenshot of this before they edit it out.

The same Mujahideen that have been killing the Serbs in Bosnia have now come into Sryia and to asst them, maybe this is why, the mainstream news outlets have been quiet they knew about them.

And i actually cant believe it they Admitted it. This is to rich, this should spread to the news networks.

www.aljazeera.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

I downloaded the video also...

nvm.

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
Funny how Slayer or John haven't responded onto this thread, truth hurts doesn't it?

If your going to call people out, can you re-state their arguments on the matter? or link relevant threads.

Much appreciated.

When your fighting a revolution you will take help anywhere you can get it. The West has been slow to help others have filled the void. Of course how much help they provide is not going to turn the tide one way or the other but, help is help.

Originally posted by MrSpad
When your fighting a revolution you will take help anywhere you can get it. The West has been slow to help others have filled the void. Of course how much help they provide is not going to turn the tide one way or the other but, help is help.

So when your fighting a revolution you will take help anywhere you can get it even from the Islamists who want to turn Sryia back into the Middle Age? That would be like saying if an America had a second civil war Ameicans should have help from China.

reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter


Could you not also view this as a individual group taking advantage of a tenuous situation in Syria to forward their own goals? Regardless of what those goals may be?

British involvement in first American Civil war?

American Involvement ...everywhere?

reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter


Okay. So the Mujahideen are fighting with the anti government rebels.

Does this mean that favour should be given to the Assad regime?

Are you saying that groups like the Muslim Brotherhood are behind the attacks?

All this fighting.

I have to wonder what the end-game is.

reply to post by beezzer


So basically your ok with that? thats rather not surprisingly. I guess this must be the new normal.
As long the rebels are agaisnt Sryia,Russia, No Problems.

Yet when the war in the country will finally settle you people will start to complian just like as you people did in libya.
(Oh look what those evil terrorist rebels did in Sryia Yesterday!) Assad should have stayed in power to get rid of them.
But even with them play, it wont matter.

reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter


Who is John?

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter

 

Okay. So the Mujahideen are fighting with the anti government rebels.

Does this mean that favour should be given to the Assad regime?

Are you saying that groups like the Muslim Brotherhood are behind the attacks?

All this fighting.

I have to wonder what the end-game is.

I believe he is looking to strike out at Slayer and "John" that supposed proxy groups are being used to fight a war, or something along those lines.

He has not really made a clear argument in this thread, i am going by other threads at the moment

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by beezzer

 

So basically your ok with that? thats rather not surprisingly. I guess this must be the new normal.

edit on 18-7-2012 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)

No, Puddin'. I'm not "ok with that".
(see, I answer your questions)

I don't have a dog in this hunt.

But I see opinions and snippets tailored to fit a personal agenda.


That distorts the truth.

reply to post by MDDoxs


First off i was referring to a member on ATS johncarter

reply to post by MDDoxs

He has not really made a clear argument in this thread, i am going by other threads at the moment

I already have and basically thats pretty much off topic.

reply to post by MDDoxs
I had a discussion with a colleague today on Syria.

We're both kinda war-weary.

I'm tired of picking a side.

I'm tired of the media picking a side.

I'm tired of people using the media to enforce the side they choose.

No-one is honest anymore.

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by MDDoxs

 

I had a discussion with a colleague today on Syria.

We're both kinda war-weary.

I'm tired of picking a side.

I'm tired of the media picking a side.

I'm tired of people using the media to enforce the side they choose.

No-one is honest anymore.

Agreed, in this case it appears OP is using news from a media source, incredibly bias one at that, to attack the arguments of other members.

See his post referencing John and slayer above.

Apologies typing on phone

Edit: looks like op edited his post I referenced. Smooth

reply to post by MDDoxs


The reason i used AJ is because this is the first AJ has Admitted something like this, usual in every most of there biased articles they have never nor do they ever put a quotation below the article.

Which is why i posted in the first place, but no rather then looking into it further on the topic i either get attacked or some people just completely ignore it.

reply to post by MDDoxs


"Critical thinking" is an oft used word here on ATS.

I'm a researcher. If I only relied on "one" experiment to prove my hypothesis, then I'd be a failure in my profession.

To play everything on "one" source, is disingenuous.