Object anomalies around the Sun - compilation.

reply to post by DenyObfuscation


Do you wear glasses or contacts and do you have them in?

I made a close-up of the image you posted, and there surely is an object there that closely resembles the one from the youtube channel in question, though as stated on that channel he/she uses filters to enhance (but not alter) images, a fairly common and accepted technique.

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

I made a close-up of the image you posted

Why? Anyone can see the fiber just fine in the image I posted.


[size=10]Where is the "UFO"?

What is Hannard up to here?

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE


That's a fiber that is on the CCD camera. There have been many threads on it, however Phage showed conclusively that it's on the camera, because the "object" moves with the satellite when it rolls.

Here is one thread from June of last year where he demonstrated this:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

And then earlier this year, when the craft did a 180 degree roll, the "object" moved with it:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Phage even linked the satellite's data link to show that it had been rolled that day in that thread.

So the "C" looking object in the Stereo pictures? It's a fiber on the CCD camera.

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE


Of course opinions can be wrong.

And in this case, you're wrong.

Size of objects seen on SOHO, STEREO etc is extremely hard to discern, unless of course you know exactly what they are and even then, the distances and perspectives involved play tricks on the eyes...

Take this image for example...



There are 3 easily identifiable objects there, Jupiter, Mercury and the Pleiades star cluster.

Jupiter is over 3000 times the size of Mercury, yet appears to be the same size.

The accumulated mass of the Pleiades is around 800 times that of the sun yet the stars appear as small dots.

You can't judge the size of an unknown object on a 2 dimensional image, especially when it's viewing the vastness of space.

A tiny dot could be a giant star hundreds of light years away, or it could be a particle of dust millimeters from the lens...


Do you understand?

Here is another video of a black cube above the Sun, it was there for days in May and again in June.

There is a video of it getting hit by some massive space debris that then falls into the Sun and the black cube doesn't move, I'm still searching for that one.

Some have theorized that this is just missing pixel data, but you can see a few CME's that engulf it at times - so that disproves that theory.







Here is another video of it in place above the Sun for days in May:

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

If someone wants to dig up the originals and show they have been altered - fine.

Check this out. It's layered using STEREO A COR2 and SOHO LASCO C3

But I can't read the dates and times in the beginning. Fortunately someone else posted this version. Pay close attention to the dates and times. While the "UFO" is parked, COR2 A is at 2012-04-28 and remains there while the C3 rolls. When it takes off, the date for the COR2 A jumps forward. The images have been manipulated to simulate the object parking and flying off.

Remember, while the object is parked in the vid the date on COR2 A is 2012-04-28 at 00:24:00. Now look at this from NASA


That's where the star was at that time. If you want to see what really happened click HERE

Select:
Telescope - Ahead COR2
Resolution - 512x512
Start Date - 20120423
End Date - 20120430
Display - Slideshow
Display one image per x - 10
Search

It's a star. Probably Regulus.

reply to post by DenyObfuscation


Sorry, I only believe the raw original feeds from NASA. It has been shown that they have tampered with thousands of images. If you are using possibly tampered with NASA images you are only going to convince the truly gullible.

Here is the latest UFO near the Sun video.

You can tell by the parallelism of the photon beams that this is not some natural phenonemon. Most photon beams will be radial in nature, not parallel.

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by DenyObfuscation

 

Sorry, I only believe the raw original feeds from NASA. It has been shown that they have tampered with thousands of images. If you are using possibly tampered with NASA images you are only going to convince the truly gullible.

Then why start a thread using images that have been tampered with? That is what you have done.

Do you not understand what I just showed you? Apparently not.

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by DenyObfuscation

 

Sorry, I only believe the raw original feeds from NASA. It has been shown that they have tampered with thousands of images. If you are using possibly tampered with NASA images you are only going to convince the truly gullible.

Then why start a thread using images that have been tampered with? That is what you have done.

Do you not understand what I just showed you? Apparently not.

All you have shown is that NASA has tampered with the originals, I'm sure no one is surprised by that. There is no point in having a discussion with you if all you are going to do is accept what NASA feeds you blindly.

Here is part two of DanielofDoriaa's objects around the Sun.

Many shots show CME's the envelop the objects to help give perspective of where they are (near the surface of the Sun) and their size (Huge!).

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

All you have shown is that NASA has tampered with the originals,

Let's do this the easy way. How do you think I showed that? If you can answer that, I'll be able to tell better how to get you to understand what I showed you.

More anomalies from around the Sun:

This video contains images of an object, that if it is near the Sun, is about 350,000km long:

Another compilation of multiple objects near the Sun over multiple times:

Another great video with an important message at the beginning:

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by DenyObfuscation

 

Sorry, I only believe the raw original feeds from NASA. It has been shown that they have tampered with thousands of images. If you are using possibly tampered with NASA images you are only going to convince the truly gullible.

Then why start a thread using images that have been tampered with? That is what you have done.

Do you not understand what I just showed you? Apparently not.

All you have shown is that NASA has tampered with the originals, I'm sure no one is surprised by that. There is no point in having a discussion with you if all you are going to do is accept what NASA feeds you blindly.

I showed you that someone made a movie on Helioviewer from original Nasa images. I showed you that the creator edited the movie using 2 DIFFERENT satellites, SOHO and STEREO to fake the "object" stopping at the dust fiber and then taking off. I gave you the info needed to see for yourself that this was just a star traversing the FOV of STEREO just like usual. Did you watch the original on STEREO?

I accepted nothing blindly. Neither from NASA nor ADG UK as you have done. You say

Sorry, I only believe the raw original feeds from NASA. It has been shown that they have tampered with thousands of images. If you are using possibly tampered with NASA images you are only going to convince the truly gullible.

but accept the edited and altered images from ADG UK.

Here are some more great videos of object anomalies near the Sun.

In the first part of this video, you can see the objects interacting and being partially obscured by CME's - indicating their location near the surface of the Sun:

Apparently the giant UFO Human Alien posted about in this thread

www.abovetopsecret.com...

has now moved to the opposite side of the Sun, and appears to be doing laps. Maybe it is the break in period for some new kind of craft, or they are trying to set a new speed record for a lap around the Sun, or maybe they are just bored waiting for 2012 events to happen.

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE


Going to have to call "hoax" on that video I'm afraid. I've just spent a good chunk of time watching the movies and stepping through both the 335 and 211 channels of the AIA (those are the 2 channels your video shows), and that objects does NOT appear in the images from SDO for 27 July.

And before anyone yells "Cover Up!" if you go back and look at the images from 22 July (on channel 335, at 14:40:46), the artifact is still there.

Sorry, but I think someone is pulling your leg with the video so they get more hits