It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

A very unusual find in the mountains of Peru.

page: 4
15
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 19 2012 @ 11:44 AM
link   


Not where the yellow circle is , but below that, at in the center. To me this looks like an entrance into the mountain, maybe an old mine, you can see where it looks to be a rock/dirt road leading into the mountain. Nothing more I can see.
edit on 19-7-2012 by Glassbender777 because: (no reason given)




posted on Jul, 19 2012 @ 01:07 PM
link   
Here is a diagram of the site in question.

A larger version is available at the Direct view below.





Direct view:

i985.photobucket.com...



posted on Jul, 19 2012 @ 01:38 PM
link   
It's an interesting image. I am leaning more towards a natural geological feature. I've flown over similar ones in Utah and the Southwestern United States.



posted on Jul, 19 2012 @ 04:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by aorAki
Coordinates (google earth) 11°36'6.50"S 76°33'53.55"W

basic geologic map

To me, rather than invoking extraterrestrial reasons, it appears as some sort of geologic structure. If you have a look at the geologic map, you will see that the area has had loads of faulting and folding, so this structure may well be the exhumed hinge of a fold, or a syncline, or an anticline. In google earth you will notice that there is a lot of erosion in the area, that there are watercourses and landslide scarps.

Personally I do not subscribe to the extraterrestrial explanation for this structure. I prefer the more parsimonious conclusion that it is a geologic structure.

Hey, if you want to really know, either go there yourself with a geologist, or contact one of Peru's Universities and ask of their geologists what they know of it. I know that in the tertiary institution where I work we are often getting queries from the general public and most of them are answered (apart from the ones from obvious kooks suggesting spaceships crash landing or some such fantasy @
.

Seriously, try asking the Peruvian geologists.

It's just a shame that this guy isn't Peruvian!
edit on 18-7-2012 by aorAki because: (no reason given)



edit on 18-7-2012 by aorAki because: (no reason given)


My personal opinion is that it is a geologic feature, much like the 'Noah's Ark' in Turkey.
I think a good place to start would be to get in touch with Peruvian geologists through one of their Tertiary Institutions, or these guys I think it's best to exhaust all plausible scenarios before embarking into fantasy, no matter how alluring it may appear to the untrained eye.



posted on Jul, 19 2012 @ 05:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by arianna
Here is a diagram of the site in question.

A larger version is available at the Direct view below.





Direct view:

i985.photobucket.com...


now, if you had put this diagram in with your op, there wouldnt be a lot of members scratching their heads wondering what the hell you were on about.
it would have started a discussion straight away. instead you choose not to, and leave a lot of people in the dark. you know full well that people are'nt going to see what you see.
so how about next thread you start with images in landscapes, you immediately highlight what you're on about in the op. it would make for a better discussion and a more interesting thread.
or do you revel in peoples bewilderment?



posted on Jul, 19 2012 @ 05:33 PM
link   
Arianna how did you get out of your cell? You were supposed to have taken your medication!



posted on Jul, 19 2012 @ 05:41 PM
link   
When taking a picture of things including rocks it is hard to get a picture that people can see. I was trying to post pictures of artifacts but found I and others could see it in the pictures if we had seen the object in person first but those who saw the pictures without seeing and personally experiencing the objects couldn't see what we were seeing. It's strange but our knowledge about an object actually allows us to put dimension into the picture. Those who haven't seen and examined the object cannot do that. Trying to get a picture that others can see is hard because of that. I tried to adjust my thinking but once you've seen it there is no way of objectively seeing the object.

Looks like rings on part of that. Possibly petrified wood from a huge tree? There is supposed to be an island out there made out of a huge tree stump.
edit on 19-7-2012 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 19 2012 @ 06:17 PM
link   
Why yes, it does appear to be a large vagina.



posted on Jul, 19 2012 @ 06:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by rickymouse
When taking a picture of things including rocks it is hard to get a picture that people can see. I was trying to post pictures of artifacts but found I and others could see it in the pictures if we had seen the object in person first but those who saw the pictures without seeing and personally experiencing the objects couldn't see what we were seeing. It's strange but our knowledge about an object actually allows us to put dimension into the picture. Those who haven't seen and examined the object cannot do that. Trying to get a picture that others can see is hard because of that. I tried to adjust my thinking but once you've seen it there is no way of objectively seeing the object.

Looks like rings on part of that. Possibly petrified wood from a huge tree? There is supposed to be an island out there made out of a huge tree stump.
edit on 19-7-2012 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)


How true!

It is a one-way process. Once you have become enlightened and able to see particular features in an image there is no way back to the time when the features couldn't be seen.



posted on Jul, 19 2012 @ 06:49 PM
link   
They found something similar at the south pole the other day I think.




posted on Jul, 19 2012 @ 06:56 PM
link   
reply to post by SecretKnowledge
 


No. I do not revel in people's bewilderment.

The reason I posted a couple of plain images in the OP was to see what members made of the view. I was under the impression that something very large had made a crash landing and gouged out a path in the landscape.

At the current time there is much speculation about the large anomalous object under the Baltic sea. There are features at the Baltic site which are similar to the characteristics of this partiular site. It was only when I posted an image in another thread that a member replied with an image of the huge head (sphinx) at Markawasi which is about 20km from the site shown here. Viewing the image of the large head spurred me to wonder if the people who worked the Markawasi site occupied any other sites in the local area. It was when I was searching for other possible sites that I came across the large anomaly seen in the images posted here.



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 02:49 PM
link   
The research I am carrying out into this anomalous object and the features on the landscape in the surrounding area is begiining to get very interesting.

This image has been slightly enhanced and the precess has produced an improvement to the downloaded image. There are many features and some appear very unusual, I get the impression from viewing the material that there may be an active life existence at this location but you will not find any of these areas on a map.

In the image there are four main areas which are definitely not the type of geological formations one would expect to see at a very high mountain location. The large anomalous object can been seen in the upper left section of the image.

Some members may find the view intriquing whilst others initially may not see many of the features. The ideal way to search for the features in the image is not to look at the full view, but to look right into a selected area.

There are two images at Direct views below. The first image is a copy of the image below and the second image is a closer view. There are features in the first image that appear clearer than in the second.

Do you see anything unusual in the image?





Direct views:

i985.photobucket.com...

i985.photobucket.com...

edit on 20-7-2012 by arianna because: text

edit on 20-7-2012 by arianna because: text



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 03:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by arianna

Originally posted by rickymouse
When taking a picture of things including rocks it is hard to get a picture that people can see. I was trying to post pictures of artifacts but found I and others could see it in the pictures if we had seen the object in person first but those who saw the pictures without seeing and personally experiencing the objects couldn't see what we were seeing. It's strange but our knowledge about an object actually allows us to put dimension into the picture. Those who haven't seen and examined the object cannot do that. Trying to get a picture that others can see is hard because of that. I tried to adjust my thinking but once you've seen it there is no way of objectively seeing the object.

Looks like rings on part of that. Possibly petrified wood from a huge tree? There is supposed to be an island out there made out of a huge tree stump.
edit on 19-7-2012 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)



How true!

It is a one-way process. Once you have become enlightened and able to see particular features in an image there is no way back to the time when the features couldn't be seen.


- enlightened-


that's a good one arianna...very rich indeed



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 03:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by arianna


In the image there are four main areas which are definitely not the type of geological formations one would expect to see at a very high mountain location.


Could you explain your reasoning for this,oh great enlightened one, and while you're at it tell me what sort of geologic formations you would expect to see at a very high mountain location?

Have you contacted anyone in the Peruvian Geologic Survey yet? (I gave you the link).



posted on Jul, 21 2012 @ 04:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by aorAki

Originally posted by arianna


In the image there are four main areas which are definitely not the type of geological formations one would expect to see at a very high mountain location.


Could you explain your reasoning for this,oh great enlightened one, and while you're at it tell me what sort of geologic formations you would expect to see at a very high mountain location?

Have you contacted anyone in the Peruvian Geologic Survey yet? (I gave you the link).


One of the main problems with aerial views is that the features cannot be realized in a surface inspection of the area unless evidence was forthcoming of structures, statues etc. A geologist would be of no help in making an analysis, but people with archaeological knowledge of the area would be more desirable.



posted on Jul, 21 2012 @ 03:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by arianna
A geologist would be of no help in making an analysis, but people with archaeological knowledge of the area would be more desirable.


A geologist would be able to tell you if it is a natural 'object',or some sort of 'artifact'. That would be a good place to start.



posted on Jul, 22 2012 @ 01:30 PM
link   
Here is a close-up view of the Andes anomaly. I have enhanced the image to draw out some of the features.

At first, I thought the anomaly was a large geological feature high up in the Andes mountains but allowing for the fact that the Markawasi stone forest is 20km away I began to think along different lines due to the number of representations of faces and figures that are showing up in the landscape.

I am now of the opinion that the anomaly is a very large ancient flying craft that crash landed at the site. This makes one wonder if the anomalous object was Noah's Ark escaping from a potential flood, but not on this planet. From viewing this close-up image it would appear that the occupants of the craft set about building a village around the craft as well as over it. If you look closely you will observe many facial representations and also some structures. I am sorry about the quality of the view but it's the best I can achieve with the GE image. Further investigation reveals that the structures cannot be seen in the distant views but they show up in the close views.

Where could this space-travelling civilization have come from?

There is only one answer to the question and that is Mars. Similar facial representations have been observed in images from Mars and the moon, so it's quite possible that this same civilization is resident on the moon as well. Did they come here because they knew a catastrophie was iminent that would threaten life on their planet? There is evidence in some of the images of Mars to suggest that a great flood took place on the planet in ancient times.

A larger version can be seen at the Direct view link below.





Direct view:

i985.photobucket.com...



edit on 22-7-2012 by arianna because: text



posted on Jul, 22 2012 @ 02:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by arianna
The research I am carrying out into this anomalous object and the features on the landscape in the surrounding area is begiining to get very interesting.

This image has been slightly enhanced and the precess has produced an improvement to the downloaded image. There are many features and some appear very unusual, I get the impression from viewing the material that there may be an active life existence at this location but you will not find any of these areas on a map.

In the image there are four main areas which are definitely not the type of geological formations one would expect to see at a very high mountain location. The large anomalous object can been seen in the upper left section of the image.

Some members may find the view intriquing whilst others initially may not see many of the features. The ideal way to search for the features in the image is not to look at the full view, but to look right into a selected area.

There are two images at Direct views below. The first image is a copy of the image below and the second image is a closer view. There are features in the first image that appear clearer than in the second.

Do you see anything unusual in the image?





Direct views:

i985.photobucket.com...

i985.photobucket.com...

edit on 20-7-2012 by arianna because: text

edit on 20-7-2012 by arianna because: text


You have EVERY reason to be excited about seeing what looks like to be an indentation (at least in the left side were the V look is and the point is to the left. After studying statues and what not on mars I am TOTALLY convinced that that is indeed indentations on mars and one such indented statue is this:
www.youtube.com...
newsfornatives.com...

Here is one from an ATS post that is incredible image evidence that to me is undeniable :
i275.photobucket.com...
Actually that image is one of the best evidences I've seen on mars of a statue in the rocks. Really should be taken very seriously. Very seriously !!!!

So keep running with what you are doing, because there is evidence of a civilization that is actually living underground though hard for most to believe. I don't think the insiders for Nasa or JPL are laughing about it, they probably know so much more than we (the public) know!

Also I truly think the martians tried to establish a colony on earth a long time ago and it was not practical for them to do so. That is why we are seeing such strange images on rocks, mountains etc. Of course the monolithic stones by the hundreds of tons is another to me no brainer.

I'm am not saying that all rock images are from mars but I have to think being that mars is so close to earth that there is information of people living on earth had contact from them. Such as Gary Wilcox and possibly Lonnie Zamora, Donald Shrum and Ernest Norman and probably many we do not know but the military, Nasa and JPL know of.
edit on 22-7-2012 by thetiler because: spelling

edit on 22-7-2012 by thetiler because: spelling and additional thought



posted on Jul, 22 2012 @ 04:41 PM
link   
Oh hell, so we're not going to try to ask people who have been there and mapped it (Peruvian geologists) but are rather now so certain that it is a crashed spaceship from Mars, based on nothing but wishful thinking and geologic ignorance.

You haven't exhausted all the plausible options and are jumping right into the fire with these claims. Bad form.

There is no hope.
edit on 22-7-2012 by aorAki because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 22 2012 @ 06:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by aorAki
Oh hell, so we're not going to try to ask people who have been there and mapped it (Peruvian geologists) but are rather now so certain that it is a crashed spaceship from Mars, based on nothing but wishful thinking and geologic ignorance.

You haven't exhausted all the plausible options and are jumping right into the fire with these claims. Bad form.

There is no hope.
edit on 22-7-2012 by aorAki because: (no reason given)


At the present, there is no need to ask anyone. The evidence speaks for itself in the huge number of landscape sculptures, and there are many of them. I am not the only person who has noticed the huge artistic artifacts. (See link below) The link with Mars is in the comparison of the artistic styles and how similar they are.

cibercentre.cat...



new topics

top topics



 
15
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join