posted on Jul, 19 2012 @ 11:18 PM
I knew immediately there would be people making comparisons to building seven collapsing
AND THERE IS NO COMPARISON.....
Just because they were both steel core structure buildings (on fire) does not mean that because
one of them didn't collapse that this provides evidence that the other building shouldn't collapse.
Building seven was burning because it had incendiary thermate weakening its central core
columns and that is a BIG difference....of course it would fall...buildings that have small fires
from high temperature combustibles like thermate weakening the central core columns are
definitely going to collapse.
Quit comparing the two....its like apples and oranges
edit on 19-7-2012 by rival because: (no reason given)