It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Deetermined
Originally posted by longlostbrother
reply to post by Deetermined
Why would I know or care?
You don't think it's a little odd that someone would enter "non-white, other" over "negro" when both were available options in the code book?
A better question is why would Joe lie about what 9 meant? Call a press conference and then, once again, lie?
Joe gave information from the codebook he was using and he represented those codes correctly. I would imagine that his investigators used the 1968 codebook as a reference because (according to your link) half of the 1961 codebook was missing information at all.
Why would he lie and say that the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the US Constitution is meaningless (And why would you also say that... it's a mystery)...
I have no idea what you're talking about on this one.
Originally posted by FreeFromTheHerd
Obama will never file that suit, because he knows know he cannot win.
The term is not commonly used anymore and is generally considered archaic because of its association with slavery and colonial and racial oppression; accepted modern terms include "mixed" and "biracial."
Originally posted by kyviecaldges
reply to post by flyswatter
The records that were asked for are private by default.
Correct. I have already stated this exact same thing in response to one of you deathers making some kind of argument about an executive order and his college and medical records.
If the issue was being brought up in discovery as part of a lawsuit to challenge his eligibility, the court would have no standing to even consider it because determination of eligibility is not even remotely within the court's jurisdiction.
And yet it was still requested in Drake v. Obama.
Barry's lawyers would have to file a motion to dismiss if this was requested because if not, then a summary judgement in favor of the plaintiffs questioning his eligibility would be entered.
The point of every lawsuit was to question his eligibility.
Judges have allowed the argument.
It matters not that his records are private, they can still be requested.
And if I am not mistaken, they were originally requested under the freedom of information act.
Lawsuits have went forward.
If they had not then we would not be having this debate.
And either Barry, the taxpayers, or some mystery party paid the attorney fees.
I doubt very seriously if any of them did this pro-bono.edit on 18/7/2012 by kyviecaldges because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
reply to post by EvilSadamClone
Nah, he only has to be white if he's a Democrat. If he's a republican, it's ok. .... not sure why.... probably something to do with the mindset they inherited from their slave-owning ancestors or something and whether they were put in the fields or in the house
The right winged racists that hate him just because of his skin color are easy to see through
the racism is peeving me off so I better go elsewhere for a while...edit on 18-7-2012 by PurpleChiten because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by flyswatter
Originally posted by kyviecaldges
reply to post by flyswatter
The records that were asked for are private by default.
Correct. I have already stated this exact same thing in response to one of you deathers making some kind of argument about an executive order and his college and medical records.
If the issue was being brought up in discovery as part of a lawsuit to challenge his eligibility, the court would have no standing to even consider it because determination of eligibility is not even remotely within the court's jurisdiction.
And yet it was still requested in Drake v. Obama.
Barry's lawyers would have to file a motion to dismiss if this was requested because if not, then a summary judgement in favor of the plaintiffs questioning his eligibility would be entered.
The point of every lawsuit was to question his eligibility.
Judges have allowed the argument.
It matters not that his records are private, they can still be requested.
And if I am not mistaken, they were originally requested under the freedom of information act.
Lawsuits have went forward.
If they had not then we would not be having this debate.
And either Barry, the taxpayers, or some mystery party paid the attorney fees.
I doubt very seriously if any of them did this pro-bono.edit on 18/7/2012 by kyviecaldges because: (no reason given)
His lawyers filing the dismissals and such were paid from the Obama campaign and reelection funds set aside for legal representation. That has been public knowledge for a long time now, but many (not necessarily saying YOU, but many) have ignored this fact.
And as far as the FOIA act goes ... there is no freedom to have this information, so being denied access was the right thing to do. I wish I could recall what exact case it was that the court finally said that there is no legal authority for the court to get this information, and no authority for them to have any part in determining presidential eligibility.
Originally posted by FreeFromTheHerd
Obama as commander in chief has zero authority over Arpaio.
Just thought you should know that.
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by Deetermined
Could it be because he wasn't a "negro?" He had a white mother and a black father. By definition he is non-white but at the same time he isn't exactly black either.
Riiiiiight... so some internet nerds figure out how the codes changed in the 60s in about 12 hours and Joe and his possee couldn't, after months, even though there was a website detailing it... since March.
Originally posted by longlostbrother
Originally posted by flyswatter
Originally posted by kyviecaldges
reply to post by flyswatter
The records that were asked for are private by default.
Correct. I have already stated this exact same thing in response to one of you deathers making some kind of argument about an executive order and his college and medical records.
If the issue was being brought up in discovery as part of a lawsuit to challenge his eligibility, the court would have no standing to even consider it because determination of eligibility is not even remotely within the court's jurisdiction.
And yet it was still requested in Drake v. Obama.
Barry's lawyers would have to file a motion to dismiss if this was requested because if not, then a summary judgement in favor of the plaintiffs questioning his eligibility would be entered.
The point of every lawsuit was to question his eligibility.
Judges have allowed the argument.
It matters not that his records are private, they can still be requested.
And if I am not mistaken, they were originally requested under the freedom of information act.
Lawsuits have went forward.
If they had not then we would not be having this debate.
And either Barry, the taxpayers, or some mystery party paid the attorney fees.
I doubt very seriously if any of them did this pro-bono.edit on 18/7/2012 by kyviecaldges because: (no reason given)
His lawyers filing the dismissals and such were paid from the Obama campaign and reelection funds set aside for legal representation. That has been public knowledge for a long time now, but many (not necessarily saying YOU, but many) have ignored this fact.
And as far as the FOIA act goes ... there is no freedom to have this information, so being denied access was the right thing to do. I wish I could recall what exact case it was that the court finally said that there is no legal authority for the court to get this information, and no authority for them to have any part in determining presidential eligibility.
Sorry, but you need to show proof of that...
watch:
His lawyers weren't paid to file those dismissals.
And how much were they paid, for what?
Go on, show your work if your going to make the claims.
Originally posted by Grambler
A little of topic, but...
Am I the only one that thought it was laughable that Obama is demanding Romney release his tax records? Why is it alright for him to claim he has privacy and doesn't have to release his records,