It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jaellma
It doesn't matter if Obama was born on a shooting star or in the middle of the Suez Canal, all that matters is this...
"President Obama was born in Honolulu and his birth certificate is valid," Joshua A. Wisch, a special assistant to Hawaii's attorney general, said in a statement. "Regarding the latest allegations from a sheriff in Arizona, they are untrue, misinformed, and misconstrue Hawaii law."
As far as the Hawaii folks are concerned, Obama is their son so there is nothing you folks can do about it.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Again I just want to point out the very important distinction: previously, they were not sure, but now, they ARE SURE that Obama's BC, as released by the WH, is fraudulent. That's a career law enforcement officer stating this, after extended and meticulous investigations that have gone on for a very long time.
I mean really, I kept expecting "Oops, we made a mistake"...or "Due to insufficient evidence, we are shutting down the case"...
But let this sink in a minute people. This is major confirmation of what so many have suspected all along. But is it actionable, and will the Congress act on this. If they don't, they should all be fired. For having no balls. Zero, nada, zilcho.
“The DNC drafted, signed and notarized TWO slightly different versions of their Official Certification of Nomination documents, not one,” he wrote. “One of those documents had complete legal language, and one of them was missing the text concerning the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama.
“The version which is absent any certification of constitutional standing for the office of president is the version that was filed with every state in the country, and the one used by the DNC to elect Barack Obama president,” he wrote.
WND contacted the Democratic National Committee multiple times over three days to request an explanation of the two images, including whether one might be a forgery.
A spokeswoman in the press office confirmed, “We are aware of it,” but declined to elaborate.