It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by andy06shake
reply to post by supermanning
Well done there mate, nice to see you got out alive and with your sensibilities intact.
Originally posted by supermanning
reply to post by supermanning
Look at this illuminati BS. and wake the hell up Jehovah's Witnesses and realize you are being conned by them!
Originally posted by supermanning
Originally posted by crawdad1914
reply to post by crawdad1914
Probably the best way for those not familiar with this cult and the damage they have done to families is to simply search " Jehovahs Witnesses disfellowshiping" on "youtube"
You will find tons of people finding solace by telling their storys, and the pain they feel of losing family members. It breaks my heart frankly.
The problem here is that any falsehoods revealed, or shattered end dates, or changes in doctrine are allways considered "new light" They will say "the light keeps growing brighter as we reach the end times", so "ALL THE FALSEHOODS OF THE PAST ARE BECAUSE WE COULD NOT SEE CLEARLY, new light has revealed what we could not see before" That will allways be their excuse, as it has in the past. Truth is truth, it does not change. So you see, they allways have an out to cover for their BS.
Originally posted by supermanning
read the section: Associate membership to the UN Department of Public Information
en.wikipedia.org...
then read this:
www.randytv.com...
"Still, the Criteria for Association of NGOs-at least in their latest version-contain language that we cannot subscribe to. When we realized this, we immediately withdrew our registration. We are grateful that this matter was brought to our attention."
I call bull shat! What they should be saying is that "well since we were caught in bed with the beast, we will withdraw our registration." How the f does an organization link up with the U.N. for 10 years and not know exactly what the wording was in the agreement between the 2 organizations? Can you say BUSTED?
Originally posted by crawdad1914
Originally posted by supermanning
read the section: Associate membership to the UN Department of Public Information
en.wikipedia.org...
then read this:
www.randytv.com...
"Still, the Criteria for Association of NGOs-at least in their latest version-contain language that we cannot subscribe to. When we realized this, we immediately withdrew our registration. We are grateful that this matter was brought to our attention."
I call bull shat! What they should be saying is that "well since we were caught in bed with the beast, we will withdraw our registration." How the f does an organization link up with the U.N. for 10 years and not know exactly what the wording was in the agreement between the 2 organizations? Can you say BUSTED?
I remember when that came out, I really thought that would be "the straw that broke the Camels back" Growing up we all were taught to despise the Beast and be no part of it. Hearing that the WTBTS was a part of the UN I expected huge fallout in the ranks. It didnt really happen of course.
Originally posted by supermanning
Originally posted by crawdad1914
Originally posted by supermanning
read the section: Associate membership to the UN Department of Public Information
en.wikipedia.org...
then read this:
www.randytv.com...
"Still, the Criteria for Association of NGOs-at least in their latest version-contain language that we cannot subscribe to. When we realized this, we immediately withdrew our registration. We are grateful that this matter was brought to our attention."
I call bull shat! What they should be saying is that "well since we were caught in bed with the beast, we will withdraw our registration." How the f does an organization link up with the U.N. for 10 years and not know exactly what the wording was in the agreement between the 2 organizations? Can you say BUSTED?
I remember when that came out, I really thought that would be "the straw that broke the Camels back" Growing up we all were taught to despise the Beast and be no part of it. Hearing that the WTBTS was a part of the UN I expected huge fallout in the ranks. It didnt really happen of course.
That's cuz it's never talked about in the meetings, and anyone who brings it up, I can almost say with certainty is brought before a judicial committee and suppressed.
Originally posted by supermanning
Check out this lovely piece of info, Watchtower owns 50% stock in warfare tech.
www.randytv.com...
Originally posted by supermanning
Check out this lovely piece of info, Watchtower owns 50% stock in warfare tech.
www.randytv.com...
according to this letter from the WT:
www.answerbag.com...
=== QUOTE:===
After looking into this matter when it was first raised, we found that none of the legal corporations used by the Governing Body in caring for Kingdom interests own stock in the Rand Cam Corporation or any associate company involved in developing the diesel engine in question. The facts are that two brothers originally involved in inventing and developing the engine made a private agreement years ago (of which we were not notified) to send a portion of any profits realized from the venture to the Watch Tower Society as a gift for its worldwide work. Subsequently, circumstances required that rights to ownership and developing the engine be transferred to a holding company not controlled by them. The Watch Tower Society was erroneously listed as a stockholder in information published by the holding company, and this error has now been corrected. Hence, the charge is totally false. Moreover, the Watch Tower Society has received no contributions as a result of the original private agreement made between the two brothers.
Originally posted by SoulVisions
Originally posted by supermanning
Check out this lovely piece of info, Watchtower owns 50% stock in warfare tech.
www.randytv.com...
I saw this topic, browsed through some of the hate, and then jumped on to the last page.
...
As to this comment related to military interests, the original comment by the previous poster was simply untrue.