It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SubAce
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by borntowatch
Mao thought he was god... And buddists had been murdering each other with zeal long before pol pot gave them a concrete social agenda.
Stalin also liked clothes as much as atheism... So why not blame clothing?
Well, at least we know his non-belief in God didn't help him be a better person.
Jehovah's Witnesses have killed 0 people in wars and genocides during the 20th century to present. There are over 8 million of them worldwide and they have never killed anyone ever anywhere. They have in many places been brutalized and murdered because they refuse to kill other people, but they still refuse to kill anyone.
Hitler murdered many Jehovah's Witnesses because they would not murder for him. Stalin murdered and brutalized many Jehovah's Witnesses because they would not murder for him.
The United States has a horrible record of discrimination and hatred toward Jehovah's Witnesses because they refused to murder their brothers.
Atheism has proven to be a failure to create peace. False religions cause only rotten fruit. Atheism is not the solution. The truth is the solution.
The End of False Religion is Near, atheism will be no safe-haven for mankind when the governments turn upon and destroy the world's religions for their disgusting badness.
Originally posted by Barcs
Are benevolent atheists just as good as any other benevolent religious person? Please answer that one as it's much more applicable today.edit on 13-8-2012 by Barcs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by daskakik
Originally posted by Barcs
Are benevolent atheists just as good as any other benevolent religious person? Please answer that one as it's much more applicable today.edit on 13-8-2012 by Barcs because: (no reason given)
Applying the logic of the OP, the answer would be yes.
Originally posted by MastaShake
Also, atheists don't support incest and pedophilia
Originally posted by daskakik
Originally posted by Barcs
Are benevolent atheists just as good as any other benevolent religious person? Please answer that one as it's much more applicable today.
Applying the logic of the OP, the answer would be yes.
Originally posted by Barcs
Yep, that's exactly why I said it. Something tells me the OP won't agree.
Originally posted by Barcs
Are benevolent atheists just as good as any other benevolent religious person? Please answer that one as it's much more applicable today.edit on 13-8-2012 by Barcs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by daskakik
Don't know if he got or missed the facts that any murderers belief/disbelief is irrelevant and that atheists are not really a group but I think not.
Originally posted by MastaShake
Also, atheists don't support incest and pedophiliaedit on 13-8-2012 by MastaShake because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by borntowatch
Atheism doesnt recognise incest as wrong. In fact atheism endorses paedophilia and incest by its non recognition of it.
Originally posted by borntowatch
You dont think that "murderers belief/disbelief is irrelevant" could be the WHOLE point of the thread, maybe...no?
You dont think atheists are a group, come on you cant be that blind?
Originally posted by daskakik
Originally posted by borntowatch
You dont think that "murderers belief/disbelief is irrelevant" could be the WHOLE point of the thread, maybe...no?
Could be, but if it is you did a pretty bad job of making that clear.
You dont think atheists are a group, come on you cant be that blind?
I'm an atheist and I don't feel I belong to any group that those on your list belonged to. I probably share more beliefs and ideals with younger religious people than Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot.
Originally posted by BagBing
Originally posted by borntowatch
Atheism doesnt recognise incest as wrong. In fact atheism endorses paedophilia and incest by its non recognition of it.
Stamp collecting doesn't recognise incest as wrong. In fact, stamp collecting endorses paedophilia and incest by its non recognition of it.
Originally posted by borntowatch
Maybe its your comprehension skills, others picked up on it quickly.
and your not in the opposing group to Christianity, the atheist klick on this site, come on. You are just a part of the crew the group but deny it.
Look at your past posts.
Originally posted by yeta67
Do people really stereotype religious persons and non-religious (atheist) persons this much? The OP's argument was so biased, I'm not even sure how to respond.
Originally posted by daskakik
No, but even if I was I would still not be part of Stalin's, Mao's and Pol Pot's groups. Even they were not part of each other's groups.
Originally posted by Barcs
Are benevolent atheists just as good as any other benevolent religious person? Please answer that one as it's much more applicable today.edit on 13-8-2012 by Barcs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by borntowatch
I am sorry, I didnt post this thread about you
and your not in the opposing group to Christianity, the atheist klick on this site,