Terror Suspects Missed at London's Heathrow Ahead of Olympics, page 1


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 12 times
Topic started on 16-7-2012 @ 10:17 AM by ModernAcademia

Terror Suspects Missed at London's Heathrow Ahead of Olympics


www.newsroomamerica.com
Officials blamed inexperienced staff for missing five terror alerts in a single day at London's Heathrow Airport, adding new security fears ahead of the London-hosted Summer Olympics set to open later this month, a report said Sunday.

"The rest of the staff, I have no idea where they have come from, how long they are here for, what their background is. These are people who have been forced by their own department to come here," the official said.
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 16-7-2012 @ 11:44 AM by TrueBrit
The reality concerning the failure at the airport to detect and deal with these potential threats is down to nothing other than the insane reductions in manpower that were forced on the UKBA (UK Border Agency) by their management and Theresa May, the Home Secretary. In an effort to save money, hundreds of jobs at UKBA were axed under TM's watch. However, later, as it was revealed that not only had numbers of staff been dropped, but proper checks were not being made on passports and so on, as part of a trial of measures meant TO KEEP QUEUES DOWN (of all the bloody stupid reasons you could name) Theresa May managed to deflect blame and responsibility onto her subordinate, one Mr Brody Clark, who claims that he acted according to her instruction by rolling out these measures, but was forced to resign over the issue!!

After this balderdash was revealed, questions (and good ones too if you ask me) were asked about the capacity of the UKBA to keep up with the increased traffic through the gates of the UK's airports, ports, and other facilities. All the assurances under the sun were given, including the promise of something close to eight hundred extra staff to cope with the influx. However, as I am sure we can all guess, there is no way that such a piddling number of people, would ever have been able to make a reasonable dent in the inevitable lines at immigration, let alone do a solid job of keeping the country safe from persons of vile intent coming over our borders.

Perhaps this would not be happening now if the staff which used to man the nations immigration desks had been properly funded, and not made redundant in order to please a bunch of suits. Perhaps if the expirenced and professional staff who were in place before the cuts came were allowed to continue their jobs, rather than languish in unemployment, or seek work in the private sector, we could have an olympics not plauged by unreasonable, and avoidable threats from outside our fair shores.

One thing I do know, Theresa May cannot pass the buck on this one, and if her head does not roll after THIS fiasco, then she must have an adamantine hyoid bone, and concrete cervical section in her spine.


reply posted on 16-7-2012 @ 11:54 AM by TruthxIsxInxThexMist
reply to post by ModernAcademia



I posted a thread on this earlier in the 'current events' forum as i've been told by the MODS that these type of threads belong in that forum.... funny though i see that yours already has more replies than mine....

Anyway i'll post what i wrote in my thread and wonder if anyone here can answer the questions:

I don't know what to make of this latest scandal to hit the headlines... there's been so much talk about lack of security at the games, security not upto doing the job, untrained security guards being called up etc etc.... now we have Security at Heathrow letting in more supposed 'terrorists' about 8 they say in this report have arrived for the Olympics or just in time for the Olympics!

Whats going on and why would they announce this in the media?

Sometimes i laugh at all these 'false flags' ATS users but maybe this time I will have to be in agreement that something is being allowed to happen or possibly happen at the Olympics!

Yes, this report is from 'the sun' but that doesn't mean its a lie... it could just mean that other media sources have not picked up on the story.

Why/how do the border control let these 8 terror suspects through? (If its true)

Either this is a 'false flag' op or these 8 terror suspects have been reading our media outlets online and seen how bad security is at he moment at the Olympics site!

Also how do they know they came through and why arent they already picked up and in a cell?


reply posted on 16-7-2012 @ 03:51 PM by seethetruth
reply to post by ProfessorT



the British police love them or hate them they have managed huge events before with no problem why it was out soused in the first place beats me the police would do a better job than the army seen as the police are out on the streets every day watching people not taking anything away from the army but the both play different rolls its like the police are been side lined in this for some private company and for me the really big question is why would they do that ?


reply posted on 16-7-2012 @ 03:58 PM by seethetruth
reply to post by GeeDee



they would know they had missed them from passport check in but once there out of the airport they could be anywhere it smells of fish to me its like its been set up for something to happen and the big army presence is like the magicians slight of hand bit with all the roof top missiles and gun boats


reply posted on 16-7-2012 @ 04:09 PM by ProfessorT
Originally posted by seethetruth
reply to
post by ProfessorT



the British police love them or hate them they have managed huge events before with no problem why it was out soused in the first place beats me the police would do a better job than the army seen as the police are out on the streets every day watching people not taking anything away from the army but the both play different rolls its like the police are been side lined in this for some private company and for me the really big question is why would they do that ?



Basically it's a money-saving scheme. Some parts of the police have already been outsourced by police forces up and down the country. Unfortunately outsourcing means that the public may not get the service they deserve. For example, there is talk of having unwarranted security guards out on the street in place of police officers. I only see this going one way. I just don't see it working. If the majority of the police service was to be outsourced and privatised more than likely the 'perks' would be lost and police officers and civilian staff would be on a basic pay rate similar to the minimum wage. The unions are fighting this all the way, thank goodness.
edit on 16-7-2012 by ProfessorT because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 16-7-2012 @ 04:17 PM by seethetruth
reply to post by ProfessorT



really when did they start to do this i left the uk in November last year so im a bit out of touch with whats happening in the day to day things
i hope the unions win i know i would not let some jumped up security guard search or arrest me


reply posted on 17-7-2012 @ 01:16 AM by ProfessorT
Originally posted by seethetruth
reply to
post by ProfessorT



really when did they start to do this i left the uk in November last year so im a bit out of touch with whats happening in the day to day things
i hope the unions win i know i would not let some jumped up security guard search or arrest me


They done this a while back. Some police forces do not have police officers or civilian staff manning the front desks of police stations anymore. That has been outsourced. Also there is talk that within the next few years (due to budget cuts) nearly 50% of the police service will be privatised. Although I cannot really see that happening. The main thing the government want to do is to save money and cut as much as they can. This is already having an affect on security as you can see with this G4S fiasco.


reply posted on 17-7-2012 @ 04:51 AM by seethetruth
reply to post by ProfessorT



yes i know about the civilians manning the stations but i did not know about them wanting to privatize front line police
i blame thatcher for this privatizing thing it does not mean cheaper because they just fix prices with the competition
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags