reply to post by ATSGrunt
If the computer room floors with numerous batteries is true, and if these suspicious batteries were not really batteries, then it would seem
counter-productive then to just go and crash passenger jets into them. But if it is true and they weren't batteries, then if you didn't really want
to disturb all that in a crazy way, then that just supports what I've been saying lately.
Would you crash a plane into a floor(s) loaded with explosives all willynilly? What would all that 'jet fuel' do to it all? There'd have to be
'jet fuel' right? If there was a 'plane'. Don't seem to me like the height of planning to crash a plane half full (or more) of jet fuel into a
section of a tower with floors laced with batteries that may not be batteries. Now does it? No.
Actually, when I put it like that that sounds rather foolish now doesn't it? It sure does.
If I speculate about demolition I think there must have been 3 types of things. One to cut the exterior, another to blow the heavy bits into adjacent
towers. (For many claim videos are fake but really a hunk of tower was found embedded in another building having been thrown there.) And a third thing
would've taken out the core. So that's one thing to cut the exterior into sections, another thing to blow the floors and eject the cut sections and
a third thing, probably located in the elevator shafts, to take out the core. Three things if it was controlled demolition. "IF".
Possible evidence for each:
1. The angled cut beams, and molten metal (possibly cutting action) at the corners.
2. The trajectories of the broken pieces landing outside the footprint and sometimes in other adjacent buildings.
3. The lack of standing and remaining significant core structure.
That's just a little speculation of mine on 3 different observed happenings, nothing too radical. I was just pondering it the other day.
But back to the floors in the North Tower.
Oh sure you can mention missing gold and it takes no time for someone to come in and 'debunk' that...
You know I really think you should've just stuck to the computer floors and not mentioned the Woolworth angle or the missing gold in this thread and
saved those 2 things for their own threads etc. You know IMO.
I'm going to take the liberty now, to mention something about the North Tower that I want everybody to pay attention to, but, even more than that, I
want to use as a litmus test of sorts. I want to, again, lay out my minute critical beef with the 'plane' that supposedly hit the North Tower as it
pertains to the Naudet 'Fireman's Video' and I'd like everyone to take a few minutes to ponder it and then to come down on one side or the other
Sound good? Ok.
Even in the article from Rense that you link they talk about 'the planes that impacted the floors of the two towers impacted floors that were
computer rooms with batteries never turned on...' Right? Ok.
Also in a lot of threads on here about demolition there is a lot of talk about all the "jet fuel" from the plane's impact and how that either went
down the elevators or exploded in air or started fires that progressively over a short time led to the destruction of the towers. Right? You know what
I'm talking about.
It's like everything that gets put forth gets debunked. You mention gold, oh, there's an answer for that etc. etc. (That's just one example, I'm
running out of letters, so.)
Here's the thing. I want everyone to look at this teeny tiny thing and come down on one side or the other about it.
Just One Thing.
Check out my avatar it basically says it all. The damage pattern shown on the face of the North Tower in the Naudet 'Fireman's Video' first strike
hit does not match the pattern that would be, and should've been created, by a 767 aircraft, had that been what it actually was.
YES, I am saying that the Naudet clip, that Jules Naudet captured, and that made the news and their DVD and became synonymous with the official story
attack of 9/11, clearly shows that there's no way that it was a 767 airliner. That's what I'm saying and anyone can watch the clip and decide for
themselves, indeed, please do. Be my guest. I am asking you to. Everyone.
I don't care if I'm wrong but no one has stepped up yet to prove that I am with what I assert and I have been asserting it for weeks now in my
different posts. Had I said something about gold I would've been debunked by now etc.
The reason why I call it a litmus test and that I want everyone to check it out and come to a conclusion about it is because I'm tired of hearing
about a 'plane' and "jet fuel" as it concerns the North Tower. I'm tired of people continuing to talk about that like they've not yet come to
any kind of conclusion about what I'm saying. I want everyone to come down on one side or the other.
Why would they crash a plane into delicate explosives? They wouldn't.