It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by hidden0
What would you say about the idea of "creative intent"? You think it, it happens, simply because you put the "creative intent" into it. Your thoughts, your will, your intent, brought it into being.
That's what Source is. Energy that is aware of itself and everything, but is curious as to the nature of NOT being perfect. Why do you think we have to figure life out ourselves? It is learning from little tiny independent pieces of itself living in an imperfect world governed by a perfect system. The system keeps us as safe as it can without ruining the experiment, the learning experience.
That is Source.
reply to post by jiggerj
And you have a knack for offering argument for the sake of offering argument, without seeing that your responses agree with the idea that we are heading in a certain direction (to know EVERYTHING). If you believe in just fifty years we will begin to have the knowledge to create immortality, what will we know in 5000 years? You know the answer, but refuse to say it because all you want to do is play devil's advocate without a purpose behind it.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by adjensen
The other faulty assumption that you're making is that just because something is understood, it doesn't mean that it can be implemented. Where are you going to find the energy to construct a universe?
We can be categorized by our biological age, and our mental age. If we could assign a technological age to humans, then about 70 years ago a bunch of six-year-olds got together and said, "Hey, let's split a teeny tiny atom and do this:
My guess is that, right now, we are at the technological age of 8. What do you think we'll be able to do when we finally grow up?
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by jiggerj
Don't you see that everything you've written is the kind of denial that people would have had just 200 years before we split the atom. People would have said that splitting the atom is god's secret and we're not allowed to know it. Others would have said it's just impossible. Others would have said there's no such thing as an atom.
Unless you think that time travel is possible, or that we can transcend reality, then no, it's not the same thing.
Who said anything about time travel?
And, here is our first stop along the way to becoming gods ourselves: www.wired.com...
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by Annee
It's the same thing, really. Who cares what we call it, so long as it's not late for dinner?
Originally posted by hidden0
I was the one saying God. God god god!
I say God - you think A
I say God - I think B
I say God - AfterInfinity thinks C
Yet A, B, and C are all letters right?
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by Annee
It doesn't matter to me because a word does not define the concept behind it. The concept defines the word. Thus, words mean different things to everyone. That's why I say it doesn't matter what we call it, but how we define the concept after we name it. The label is only as good as the meaning behind it.
To afterinfinity: Yeah but its all still language and letters and symbols. Cat may not be bat, but I could maybe think you mispelt it or had other intentions for it's usage.
God relates to religion
God - - a label humans gave to "off-planet beings" - - descending from the sky or appearing out of no where (such as a dimensional being manifesting physical).
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by Annee
What about love Annee, could love have it's own reasoning or logic?
Think of the love of a mother to her child - could the self aware energy not also feel the same thing towards all his children (begotten of as a first/last cause)?
Originally posted by AfterInfinity=
And how many people will agree with this definition? My point is, you came up with that definition. That is how YOU define god, no one else. Therefore, you can completely redefine god in your mind, because there is no solid definition. No universal definition. Admittedly, it's a loose word, but whatever.
Do as you will.