It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
May as well call it 'creationism', though. I strongly suspect a God of some sort is behind the Universe.
It's just that no religion has a handle on it yet, and it's something way beyond the comprehension of someone with a strictly theological background.
Originally posted by Klassified
God, divinity, deity, all denote a being worthy of, or demanding worship. Therein lies my problem, and why I won't call it/them god(s).
4. It is known that there were oceans and seas back then. This is the possible explanation, or the "medium" in which life must have been made - the "primordial soup" - except water also requires an oxygen atmosphere and itself is 1/3 oxygen.
Originally posted by Druscilla
reply to post by Lionhearte
I suggest you revisit your geological history.
Earth formation and atmosphere
Cyanobacteria is the word you might need to pay careful attention to.
During the period 2.7 to 2.2 billion years ago, these early bacteria – known as cyanobacteria – used energy from the Sun for photosynthesis, and release oxygen as a byproduct. They also sequestered carbon dioxide in organic molecules.
Before Cyanobacteria, any oxygen was locked up. No free oxygen in the sense you understand it.
Originally posted by jiggerj
The question is: Will there ever come a time when we've learned everything we can possibly learn and can go no further? What evidence is there to suggest this? Isn't it reasonable to assume that if something is knowable, we humans will figure it out sooner or later?
Cyanobacteria are most commonly found lakes, rivers, and oceans. In water, in other words - and as addressed above, water is 1/3 oxygen. You know, H2O.
If you are suggesting we evolved from Cyanobacteria, or it "helped" evolution, I wonder how it survived the toxic environment.
There's no cells made simply of jelly.
Valonia ventricosa, also known as "bubble algae" and "sailors’ eyeballs",[2] is a species of algae found in oceans throughout the world in tropical and subtropical regions. It is one of the largest single-cell organisms.[2][3]
Originally posted by XeroOne
reply to post by Lionhearte
I guess you've never heard of anaerobic bacteria?
Originally posted by jiggerj
Then you are saying that one day mankind will reach a point where we can learn no more. Just my opinion, but I don't see this happening. If something is knowable, and if we don't destroy ourselves along the way, we will know it and become like gods.
Thinking further on this, if you believe in magic, if you believe a god created this universe by waving a magic wand while uttering Abracadabra, then this discussion can go no further. But, if you believe that a god used perfectly sound logic and science to create this universe, then that process is knowable. And, if it is knowable, then we will figure it out.
Originally posted by boncho
So there is no water on the Moon or on Mars or any other planet without oxygen.
Check.
Originally posted by jheated5
So once we create the first lifeforms from non living matter, we as a species will be considered gods?
Originally posted by Cuervo
reply to post by jiggerj
You just blew my mind. I have my own reasons for believing in creation but using our inevitable creation of another life wasn't one I thought of.
It makes total sense. If we will someday create life then that opens the probability of there being a creator to humanity. I can't believe this never crossed my mind.
Assuming organisms that evolved from anaerobic bacteria (that is your suggestion, correct?) somehow managed to turn from an Anaerobic respiration to an Aerobic respiration because it somehow "knows" that there is an oxygen-lacking environment, and then something happened to make it an oxygen-environment (so that the cells would evolve, creating the next generation of bacteria that survived in an oxygen environment) would not only require more faith than you have than I do in my God, but it would also be a miracle. Somehow, that shouts out contradiction.
*
Once non-genetic factors such as age, illness, or smoking were removed, a subset of the group seemed to have a blood-oxygen concentration that was 10% higher than normal. This trait was inherited in a way that suggested the difference was due to a single gene.
The researchers also found that the children of women with this putative gene are much more likely to survive to the age of 15, when they are old enough to have children of their own. In the low-oxygen group, each woman had on average 2.5 children that died during childhood. In the high-oxygen group, that average was just 0.4.
The clouds on mars do not contain carbon dioxide or ammonia, like Jupiter or Venus does, but contains water vapor, suggesting a thin (note, very thin), oxygen atmosphere.
except water also requires an oxygen atmosphere and itself is 1/3 oxygen.
Seven hundred and fifty light-years from Earth, a young, sunlike star has been found with jets that blast epic quantities of water into interstellar space, shooting out droplets that move faster than a speeding bullet.
The discovery suggests that protostars may be seeding the universe with water.
I propose that one day (probably very soon) we will learn how to create life from scratch in a laboratory. Does anyone have a valid reason to doubt this?
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Arthur C. Clarke
So, if we can logically assume that mankind's knowledge knows no boundaries, ...
All I'm suggesting is that atheists need to concede that it's not impossible.
Originally posted by jiggerj
I propose that one day (probably very soon) we will learn how to create life from scratch in a laboratory. Does anyone have a valid reason to doubt this?
If we don't doubt that we will create life from scratch, then why would anyone have a reason to doubt that one day (maybe far FAR into the future) we will learn how to create universes? Again, if this knowledge is out there, why wouldn't we come to know and understand it - and use it?
Originally posted by Deetermined
reply to post by Klassified
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Arthur C. Clarke
Doesn't the book of Enoch tell us that God is going to destroy the fallen angels for having taught mankind "secrets and magic" because we weren't supposed to have it? Knowing that we would use it more for the work of evil than good?
...and the sons of men in those days took from the cattle of the earth, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the air, and taught the mixture of animals of one species with the other, in order therewith to provoke the Lord; and God saw the whole earth and it was corrupt, for all flesh had corrupted its ways upon earth, all men and all animals.
Originally posted by Klassified
I believe so. In the book of Jasher, it talks about some of those secrets.
Jasher 4:18
...and the sons of men in those days took from the cattle of the earth, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the air, and taught the mixture of animals of one species with the other, in order therewith to provoke the Lord; and God saw the whole earth and it was corrupt, for all flesh had corrupted its ways upon earth, all men and all animals.